incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian McCallister <>
Subject Re: Blaze and Openness of Standards (was Re: [Proposal] Blaze)
Date Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:03:05 GMT

On Aug 1, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:

> Could you clarify whether you are asking if the Glasgow project could
> continue in a different direction from the spec, or whether the spec,
> itself, could be changed/forked and distributed by the ASF?

If something were to happen to cause development to stop on the spec,  
the licensing terms were to change, etc, could folks (including  
Glasgow) basically use the last released version as a starting point  
for continued protocol development, or would the licensing terms (and  
grants of rights specifically tied to use of this protocol based on  
this document) force the project and existing users to throw things  
away and develop something new which would not infringe.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message