incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Cliff Schmidt" <>
Subject Re: Blaze and Openness of Standards (was Re: [Proposal] Blaze)
Date Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:45:06 GMT
Does anyone have any further concerns about this proposal?

- I think Glasgow is fine since it appears not to conflict with any
registered software marks.  I don't think we need to be worried about
the university reference, and we obviously have several projects
already named for cities.  I'm also not worried about any company's
old unregistered code names.

- There was also the question about how the AMQP specification will be
handled and licensed.  I started this thread with my feelings about
that aspect (short version: it looks better than some other currently
incubating projects, but I'd like us to come up with guidelines about
what is acceptable at Apache, and then make sure this project adheres
to those guidelines before graduating from the incubator).

As the champion for the project, I'll start a vote for this unless I
hear unresolved concerns in the next 48 hours or so.  I'll also make
sure the wiki is updated, if necessary, before calling the vote.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message