incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mads Toftum <>
Subject Re: Is there a "no graduate" option?
Date Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:18:16 GMT
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 04:51:42PM -0500, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Ok, so say we went with X=12. There are 13 projects that fit that 
> description. Of those, 3 have status updates that date within that X 
> month timeframe, leaving 10 that, at least to me, appear to be inactive 
> for more than X months.
> So, say we were to vote on their continuation. Then what? Do we list 
> them as "failed"? That seems really harsh. Is there another term that 
> can be used?
I'm not sure that "voting on their continuation" is the correct thing to
do, but I would certainly hope that the incubator pmc will take the
project up to revision at that point - probably even after 6 months of
no apparent activity. Auto terminating after a set period would be too
harsh, but reviewing and deciding wether to continue is reasonable.


Mads Toftum
`Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message