incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ceki Gülcü <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Granting committer status to log4net developers
Date Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:47:16 GMT

At 03:02 PM 1/12/2004 -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> >
> > Once the legal aspects are resolved, why adopt such a radical
> > position? Is it warranted?
>the resolution of the legal aspects is done by the incubator.
>why don't restaurants perform their own health inspections?
>it's not a radical position.  the incubator exists, in part,
>to *assure* that all the necesssary steps are taken.

It would helpful if the purpose of the Incubator was clarified. If it is an 
inspection tool, then it should not be disguised as a service. Taking your 
analogy, health inspectors do not go around pretending to be a restaurant.

>#ken    P-)}
>Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Golux.Com/coar/
>Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/
>"Millennium hand and shrimp!"

Ceki Gülcü

      For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
      ISBN: 2970036908  

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message