incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <>
Subject Re: [HEADSUP] New Incubator site in CVS
Date Fri, 17 Oct 2003 06:39:31 GMT
David Jencks wrote:

> This is pretty nice looking and better than what I could do in a finite  
> amount of time:-)


> A couple of comments, I apologize that they are somewhat negative.

Hey, if they were only positive they would not be needed ;-)

> -- The material in the left sidebar seems to me to change randomly  
> depending on which page I'm on.  The result is that I think the site is  
> a disorganized maze.  I don't know how these sidebars are generated,  
> but if they were all the same or all the same for a given tab it would  
> be much less confusing for me.

This is wierd... I mean, when I click on all the links on teh left 
navigation, I always get a page that has the same navigation... wait... 
you mean that STATUS pages, right? Yup, that's wrong, gotta fix it :-)
Any other page other than /projects/** that generates wierd navigation?

> --Perhaps this is covered in your request for a better boilerplate  
> status template, but I can't discern how the alleged STATUS file is  
> intended to relate to the STATUS web page linked to from the  
> list-of-projects page.

I agree, it has to be redone.

> My impression from loosely following this list  
> is that the STATUS file for a podling is supposed to be plain text

The source is plain text, but Forrest is able to render it as HTML.


renders as

> and  
> confine itself to noting which of the steps shown in the STATUS web  
> page have been passed, which have problems, and which have not yet been  
> attempted.  

Correct, that's the idea.

> Again, my impression is that any information on the actual  
> development state of the project (such as most of the geronimo status  
> email) is supposed to be elsewhere, such as on the projects' web site.   

Hmmm, well you are correct on saying that this page should contain only 
*incubation* status, so the boilerplate page itself must change, but I 
still think that adding there the project reports is a good thing 

> If indeed the official cvs STATUS page is supposed to be plain text,  
> all the html seems redundant and confusing. 

Hmmm... maybe it's just the current page contents.

> If the idea is to render  
> an xml status document into html, putting a few "answers" into the html  
> would make the intent much clearer.


> Many thanks for working to make the incubation process clearer and more  
> visible.

And many thanks for helping in making it better :-)

I'll note on this list when a new boilerplate status is ready, so you 
can help me on that one later. Thanks.

Nicola Ken Barozzi         
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message