incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <>
Subject Re: Exit Criteria
Date Tue, 23 Sep 2003 12:02:43 GMT
Steven Noels wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>>>  Engagement by the XMLbeans community with the XML PMC and other ASF 
>>> sub communities, particularly infrastructure@ (this reflects my 
>>> personal bias that projects should pay an infrastructure "tax").
>>>   Incubator PMC has voted for graduation
>>>   XML PMC has voted for final acceptance
>> Not needed. XML PMC already accepted it, we cannot have the case in 
>> which the Incubator says ok, and then the XML one does not. As a 
>> sponsor that has voted for incubation there is no reason why they have 
>> to vote again.
> (nothing to do with the infrastructure tax:)
> Do I read you correct in saying that the receiving PMC has no chance 
> anymore to declare an incubation failed, if the Incubator PMC says the 
> contrary? 


The sponsoring PMC asks to have that project. This means that it *wants* 
that project and that community. Why would it change its mind?

> In that case (and I hope I'm wrong), why is the receiving PMC 
> involved then?

Eh? In the same way the shepherd is, the sponsor is, etc. They are 
involved in helping out and seeing that the incubated project becomes 
*part* of the community.

I don't understand you... how do you se the role of the sponsoring PMC 

Nicola Ken Barozzi         
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message