incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew C. Oliver" <>
Subject Re: [RESULT] Release 2.3
Date Sun, 23 Feb 2003 19:56:03 GMT
>A bugzilla or Scarab admin is needed, yes? 
I sent infrastructure about this.  We've already gotten some response.

>Gump is also on the todo list, for nightly build processing.
I figured I'd wait until after the Maven reorg because I don't want to 
do this twice.  (Since maven will undoubtably affect the configuration 
and Gump is a pain in the ass to configure).

>I can help with Maven reorg.
>I'm not sure what happened with incubation, but lets get this back on 
I don't want to start a flamewar about this, but I'd also recommend 
using Maven instead of Forrest for the documentation.  Although Forrest 
is really cool and flexible and has templates especially designed for 
usability, etc etc..  Its really slow.  This isn't a big deal for site 
generation but can be a pain durring development (anyone changing a page 
has to run the build, etC)... PDF generation is nice, but its not 
particularly useful since every page gets it own PDF.

In any case, if you do decide on using forrest and you're not able to 
Mavenize within the timeframe you'd like, I could do a Centipede build 
(Centipede is integrated with Forrest).  While I suggest using Maven for 
this project, I can get a Centipede build together fairly quickly as 
well as it running under gump quickly.  (I can just copy what is done 
for other projects).  I suggest this only in the spirit of getting the 
ball rolling.  I'd like to see Tapestry on its way out of the incubator 
within the next month or so.  The community looks strong, we have only 
infrastructural obsticles.


P.S. I haven't forgotten about the other little task I have to do, I'd 
just like to save that for last as its likely to generate a large amount 
of conversation that I don't have time for.  (between traveling and 
being sick)

>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: [] 
>>>Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 7:33 AM
>>>To: Tapestry development
>>>Subject: Re: [RESULT] Release 2.3
>>>It's my understanding that the primary distribution site for 
>>>all Jakarta 
>>>project releases is to be Jakarta, not sourceforge.
>>>Give now redirects to Jakarta, shouldn't the 
>>>release be 
>>>done 'the apache way'?
>>>dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
>dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message