I vote for option 3Le jeu. 14 juin 2018 à 18:46, Russel Winder <firstname.lastname@example.org> a écrit :On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 14:53 -0400, Keith Suderman wrote:
> How about an option #4. If you are planning to do one more release of 2.6.0
> anyway just drop the 'alpha' from the name and announce that it is the first
> and last 2.6.x release expected.
I think this would be a bad idea. We haven't had any beta releases, nor RC
releases. To jump to a final release strikes me as failure of proper process.
Also leaving 2.6.0-alpha-3 as the last 2.6 release clearly indicates it is a
retired version series. It also leaves it open much better for someone to pick
it up should they so wish.
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200
41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077
London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk