groovy-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul King <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy 2.6 potential retirement to focus on Groovy 3.0
Date Sat, 23 Jun 2018 01:53:22 GMT
There was overwhelming support to drop 2.6 to focus on 3.0 and mixed
on whether to do one more 2.6 alpha release or not. So, I'll go ahead and
do one more
2.6 alpha release - quite possibly much less work than further discussions
and it gives
us a clean end point which I am highly in favour of to reduce subsequent
about what exactly was in the last alpha release.

We aren't planning to delete the branch - so it's still around if we need
further emergency regression fixes down the track, but we aren't planning
to do
any merges, so it will start to go out of sync with other branches. So even
if you
have an "emergency fix" for that branch, we'd encourage you to have a
on the mailing list before creating PRs against that branch.

Cheers, Paul.

On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 8:55 AM Robert Stagner <> wrote:

> option #2 for me
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 12:06 AM Paul King <> wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> There was some discussion at gr8conf about how to speed up delivery of
>> Groovy 3.0. Some of that discussion was around the scope of what we want to
>> include and have yet to complete in 3.0 but I won't discuss that right now.
>> One of the other discussion points was Groovy around 2.6. As many of you
>> know, we have released alpha versions of Groovy 2.6. That version is a
>> backport of most but not all of Groovy 3.0 to JDK7 including the Parrot
>> parser (though it isn't enabled by default). The purpose of this version
>> has always been to assist people/projects wanting to use the Parrot parser
>> but who might be stuck on JDK7. So in some sense it is an intermediate
>> version to assist with porting towards Groovy 3.0. While that is still a
>> noble goal in theory, in practice, many of our users are already on JDK8
>> and we have limited resources to work on many potential areas.
>> With that in mind, we'd like to understand the preferences in our user
>> base for the following two options:
>> Option 1: please continue releasing the best possible 2.6 even if that
>> slows down the final release of Groovy 3.0 and delays further work on
>> better support for JDK9+.
>> Option 2: please release one more alpha of 2.6 over the next month or so
>> which will become the best version to use to assist porting for users stuck
>> on JDK7 and then focus on 3.0. The 2.6 branch will essentially be retired
>> though we will consider PRs from the community for critical fixes.
>> Feedback welcome.
>> Cheers, Paul.

View raw message