groovy-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From MG <>
Subject Re: traits fields initialization order ?
Date Sat, 10 Mar 2018 22:18:35 GMT
Hi Paul,

thank you for the feedback (I searched the Groovy Jira, but was using 
"field assignment" as the search term, so missed this issue).
Weird bug, just taking away all the final qualifiers actually works, no 
@Lazy required - I didn't even test that far, since that is such a 
general problem, that I would have thought people would already have 
complained about this in troves...


On 10.03.2018 22:10, Paul King wrote:
> There is a known bug in trait initialization for final fields:
> It's on my list to fix before 2.5.0 final. Happy for any assistance.
> Cheers, Paul.
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 6:37 AM, MG < 
> <>> wrote:
>     Hi,
>     I recently refactored the reflection code of my framework to
>     support using traits to share fields. The shared fields are
>     initialized during field declaration (i.e. not in a ctor) for user
>     convenience (they represent columns in a table). In this
>     particular case, fields needed to be passed as parameters to to
>     other field's ctors. In this case the problem is, that the fields
>     passed to other fields ctors seem to alwys be null. The same code
>     constructs have been working for years when using them directly
>     inside a class.
>     Questions:
>      1.  What is the expected behavior in this case ? Should this work
>         in traits ?
>      2. If this is not a bug in Groovy: What is the best workaround ?
>         I only had very little time to work on this last week, so I
>         used a @Memoized helper method whose return value is used in
>         both the field initializations - works, but a pretty terrible
>         solution and user experience.
>         I just did a quick spike at home using @Lazy on one field:
>         This seems to work, but not, if combined with final - so the
>         field could be reassigned (which I don't want) unless the
>         framework user introduces a shared @Lazy "hidden" private
>         helper field (similar to my @Memoized method).
>      3. In general: What is the exact order that fields get
>         initialized in Groovy - and is this behavior expected to
>         change in the future ?
>     Cheers,
>     mg

View raw message