groovy-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From MG <>
Subject Re: Fund Groovy Development - Jira Task
Date Sun, 11 Mar 2018 16:41:07 GMT
Hi Daniel,

if you write stuff like that, I feel you are effectively discouraging 
people to praticipate in this test balloon.
We can switch to whatever fits best later on, but right now we should 
see what people's reaction to this is - which might very well also be: 
"I would prefer to fund through xyz".
If people do not want to fund Groovy development (at least the generic 
"fund Java 9 compatibility" bounty/target should appeal to anyone 
interested in the advancement of Groovy), then it does not matter what 
funding platform you offer.

Funding by multiple people would already possible through the Jira 
approach (just pledge in the comment section).

Splitting money between multiple contributors is a problem that we can 
hopefully solve once there is some money to split.


On 11.03.2018 17:28, Daniel.Sun wrote:
> BTW, each issue or feature can be sponsored by multiple people and can be
> fixed by multiple volunteers. Compared with JIRA to record sponsorship
> details, I prefer to use PR of Github. The groovy sponsorship project
> repository can be setup at groovy/sponsorship of Github, which we should ask
> Groovy project lead for approving.
> Cheers,
> Daniel.Sun
> --
> Sent from:

View raw message