groovy-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From MG <>
Subject Re: Interest in a @UtilityClass AST transform
Date Fri, 12 Jan 2018 01:58:52 GMT
I feel that this would register only on the ok-to-have level for me, for 
the simple reason, that

 1. You do not typically have a lot of utility-classes (or
    function-classes) in a project
 2. Afaiks all you save is the static keyword before every method,
    because if you incorrectly instantiate the class, you basically get
    an Object, and no harm is done

I would much rather see features such as final variables without an 
explicit type not being of type Object but of the type assigned to them 
- or proper named parameters (though I understand that this is alas a 
much bigger feature to implement), to get Groovy up to speed in this regard.


On 12.01.2018 01:57, Paul King wrote:
> Hi all,
> Would there be interest in a @UtilityClass annotation - similar to 
> lombok's:
> It is similar to @Category in some ways but with some useful differences.
> What do folks think?
> Cheers, Paul.

View raw message