It's the kind of new feature (potentially wide impacting) that we have created Groovy Enhancement Proposals for in the past. Most recently we have just used well-fleshed out Jira issues with a GEP label.I'm +1 for exploring the idea further but -1 for trying to implement a small piece of the feature without at least fleshing out the bigger picture.Cheers, Paul.On 24 Jul. 2017 12:14 am, "Guillaume Laforge" <email@example.com> wrote:Many people do also like that feature :-)And it's good to have that conversation and discussion!GuillaumeOn Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Daniel Sun <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Because many people do not like the feature, it will not be implemented for
the time being util we reach a consensus.
P.S. It is actually a poll.
View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble
.com/VOTE-About-the-Union-Type -for-method-constructor-declar ation-tp5742265p5742283.html
Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.