I didn't backport the fix for the issue in question because it wasn't a trivial change, and seemed to be more of an enhancement than a bugfix. That being said, I don't feel too strongly about the changes not being in 2.4.X, so I'd be OK with backporting the changes if other committers are for it.

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Cédric Champeau <cedric.champeau@gmail.com> wrote:
Fixes should almost always be backported, unless there's a good reason not to (for example, backporting means rewriting part of the fix). If it's not the case, then it's a mistake. I have not been capable of checking if the recent fixes on master have been systematically backported, but they should. So hopefully this is just JIRA not up-to-date.

2016-01-15 21:13 GMT+01:00 Winnebeck, Jason <Jason.Winnebeck@windstream.com>:
Sorry, I wasn't clear. By snapshot I meant a declaration/tag by the developers. For example when Groovy team releases 2.5.0-beta1, not only is it something I can explain globally "we are using 2.5.0-beta1 and see xyz", but it also means that the team is saying the code is in a reasonable state for someone to use (i.e. there's not a major refactor in progress -- for example I have no clue if 2.5.0 being a new feature branch has a refactor going on).

Anyway, knowing about the snapshot builds is useful as I can eliminate any potential mistake in my build process. I will try that snapshot JAR Monday to verify the fix for GROOVY-7705 for our application.

I apologize about the side-tracked conversation, initially I only meant to ask whether or not a release was soon to know if I should go through the effort of validating a nightly for a production system. Since 2.5 beta is not soon, the only open question left for me is if GROOVY-7705 could be backported into 2.4.6 or at least 2.4.x (I'd feel safer with a 2.4.7-SNAPSHOT than 2.5.0-SNAPSHOT). I asked that in the JIRA.

-----Original Message-----
From: Pascal Schumacher [mailto:pascalschumacher@gmx.net]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 2:54 PM
To: users@groovy.apache.org
Subject: Re: Groovy Beta

Hi Jason,

you do not have to build it yourself if you want to validate a snapshot.

You can add https://oss.jfrog.org/artifactory/oss-snapshot-local/ as a maven repo and pull 2.5.0-SNAPSHOT from there.

-Pascal

Am 15.01.2016 um 20:46 schrieb Winnebeck, Jason:
> I have built Groovy on my home machine successfully, it is not bad at all. However, I'm working on a large enterprise app, so it is nice to at least have some form of snapshot in time. So, I can deploy it to our local Maven repository under different group ID, but then I still have the uncertainty of pulling the latest code and not even knowing if there is a half-finished task or refactor going on in there, whereas with a "blessed" beta the team is saying they think the code is clean. I could validate the "tip" works in our app but that is not productive if a release is coming soon. There's also the awkward-ness of having a custom-built Groovy not-quite-2.4 but not-quite-2.5 version out and about. However, the fix is big enough for me that if it doesn't make it into the recent 2.4.6 release, I may very well go through the effort to build the tip of beta branch and validate.
>
> Jason
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russel Winder [mailto:russel@winder.org.uk]
> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 2:29 PM
> To: users@groovy.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Groovy Beta
>
> On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 19:05 +0000, Winnebeck, Jason wrote:
>> A Groovy issue that affects us significantly was recently fixed in
>> the Apache JIRA as "2.5.0-beta1". From what I can tell, there is not
>> currently a place to download betas. Is there a plan to release a
>> Groovy 2.5 beta milestoon soon?
> Probably not. I compile and install from source. Takes about 22 mins on my workstation (which is 9 years old so I expect modern kit to do better).
>
> --
> Russel.
> =============================================================================
> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder@ekiga.net
> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel@winder.org.uk
> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message and any attachments.