ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Matèrne (jhm) <apa...@materne.de>
Subject AW: Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy release
Date Thu, 18 May 2017 10:56:24 GMT
I would favour 1.7 as it's the newest before the major update to Java8.
Having a 1.7 in the target environment should not been so restrictive ...

Jan

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Paul King [mailto:paulk@asert.com.au]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2017 11:27
> An: Ant Developers List
> Betreff: Re: Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy
> release
> 
> The current version of Groovy has 1.6 as the minimum but is our
> maintenance stream.
> The upcoming next version will require 1.7 and versions with 1.8 as the
> minimum are not too far away.
> 
> Ant 1.9.x is still on Java5 but Ant 1.10.x requires Java 8.
> 
> I don't think Gradle uses any Ivy classes any more.
> 
> I'd recommend 1.7 since most active projects will be releasing on
> 1.7/1.8 and then after a release, if all goes well activity-wise, I'd
> then bump the Ivy version and target 8.
> 
> Cheers, Paul.
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Nicolas Lalevée
> <nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org
> > wrote:
> 
> > I think that upgrading the requirement on the JDK is a good idea,
> > because at least us, the maintainers, need at some point to be able
> to
> > test it if there is an issue with that minimum JDK.
> >
> > One thing to consider is which JDK is being required in the
> > environment Ivy is being used: Ant, Gradle, SBT, Eclipse, Intellij…
> We
> > shouldn’t require too high.
> >
> > Nicolas
> >
> > > Le 18 mai 2017 à 10:58, J Pai <jai.forums2013@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > >
> > > Now that the plan seems to be to release 2.5.x of Ivy, would it be
> > > fine
> > if we mandate the _minimum_ Java runtime version to be something
> > higher than Java 5 that’s currently supported for 2.4.x
> > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-
> milestone/compatibility.html.
> > >
> > > Given that Java 6 itself has long been EOLed, I’m not sure whether
> > > we
> > should consider that as minimum supported version or something
> higher.
> > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Things will be a bit more easy to develop and test once we finalize
> > > on
> > the Java version.
> > >
> > > -Jaikiran
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For
> > > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional
> > commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> >
> >


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message