ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jesse Glick <>
Subject Re: xor condition
Date Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:44:47 GMT
On 07/16/2011 08:59 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> xor(true, false) == true
> xor(true, false, true) == false
> xor(true, false, true, false) == false
> Is this correct?

Follows the usual semantics; cf.:

> It would seem that semantically an xor over multiple
> nested conditions should mean that exactly one value should evaluate
> true in order for the xor operation to yield truth.

Which is in fact the case in the examples you mentioned, but probably you are thinking of

xor(true, true, true) == true

which is consistent with the algebraic definition, and the behavior of Java's ^ operator for
that matter. If you wanted a condition with the semantics you describe, it 
should be named something else.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message