ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruce Atherton <>
Subject Re: Issue 45190 and Ant 1.7.1
Date Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:28:18 GMT
I understand the sentiment, but the implication is that our releases are 
always identical to our betas. AFAIR we have never had that policy before.

The benefit to doing that is that we know we haven't added code that 
hasn't been through an adequate release cycle, no matter how trivial a 
change might be.

The downside, though, is that only really serious bugs tend to get 
addressed during a beta cycle, because people naturally want to minimize 
the number of betas that are released.

If we want to go that way, we should probably have a vote on it, IMHO.

Steve Loughran wrote:
> I'm more ruthless here, I'd stick it out and say 1.7.2. Otherwise more 
> bugs come in and get patched in late.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message