ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dominique Devienne" <>
Subject RE: repository
Date Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:00:43 GMT
> From: Matt Benson []
> --- Russell Gold <> wrote:
> > How does this compare with
> > <>,
> > which has been listed on the external tools page
> > for several weeks - a task which, when I offered
> > it two months ago, was rejected with the comment
> > that such tasks don't belong in ant proper?
> As I recall, I asserted that this would be the
> prevailing attitude at that time.  Dominique, then
> teetering at the very _brink_ of "committerhood," held
> the opinion that this type of thing would likely cross
> the line into being a necessity in the future.  My
> diagnosis was based on my observations of the
> community process more than anything.  I don't recall
> the topic getting any more negative than that (but I'm
> too lazy to go look).

Yes, I second Matt's recollection. I never took the time to
study your code, but I definitely kept it in the back of my
mind for later on. Then Steve came along and blazed his own
trail ;-) I guess the difference is that Steve is already a
long time committer, obviously, so he can do as he pleases
until someone says anything ;-))) and since he's a committer
we know he'll be around to support his creation.

One of the reasons behind the 'prevailing attitude' Matt talks
about is that people create tasks, submit them to Ant, and then
disappear from the face of the earth, leaving the maintenance
burden on committers. And since we now have Antlibs, it becomes
easier to say to people get create an antlib anyone can use.

Neither Matt and I had anything against your task. I hope you'll
accept to work with Steve and others to merge your efforts with
his. Personally though, I don't like that Steve used HttpClient
to do a simple fetch. <get> does not need it. Yes, HttpClient is
great and all, but I view it as overkill for this, and an undue
dependency, which pulls in yet another dependency.

As I though then, and still think now, dependency downloading
should be part of Ant code, and not require anything more than
JDK 1.2. I know Steve thinks the JDK stinks, but for downloading
files is plenty enough, and <get> demonstrates that!


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message