ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Bodewig <>
Subject Re: SubAnt output
Date Fri, 02 Jul 2004 08:07:55 GMT
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Dominique Devienne <> wrote:

> [DD] What if instead of adding all these methods, we called
> [DD] ant.perform() instead of ant.execute()!?
> [DD] perform() fires the the taskStarted event, so would that be
> [DD] enough? Would be a lot less code, no?

It would help with the I/O "problem" but at the same time cause a task
started event for <ant> which would lead to some visible output.  This
would make the design choice of delegating to Ant use visible and even
be confusing to users (which <ant> task?  I never started an <ant>


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message