ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Costin Manolache <>
Subject Re: beating the dead Ant 1.6 horse
Date Thu, 14 Aug 2003 05:38:50 GMT
Conor MacNeill wrote:
> The others are antlib/namespace/polymorph stuff. I'm wondering if we can
> get to the point where the ant optional tasks are packaged as antlibs and
> potentially not added to the root loader if their supporting libraries are
> not also available to the root loader. This would allow them to be
> taskdef'd in later in a build.

What's the status on that ? Any decision on how to deal with the loaders ?
I'll have some time next week, I wanted to finish the classloader task - is
it still usefull ?


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message