ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Bodewig <>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Better abstraction within ExtensionUtil and ExtensionSet
Date Mon, 17 Jun 2002 06:24:11 GMT
On 14 Jun 2002, Timothy Halloran <thallora@GS06.ISRI.CMU.EDU> wrote:

> So, the set of packages under *.ant.taskdefs.optional.* are worth
> looking at.

Not all of them, but you seem to know that ...

> Is there a document breaking out Ant packages and their mandated JDK
> level, or just "build.xml"?

Look at build.xml.  If a class is not matched by the patternsets that
make them require jdk1.2+ or even higher, don't touch them.

> I am developing a tool that finds uses of concrete classes where
> Interfaces would be better and automatically and suggests them to
> the programmer.

Sounds very useful.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message