ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steve Loughran" <>
Subject Re: javadoc changes: have they broken xdoclet?
Date Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:41:24 GMT

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Bodewig" <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 23:35
Subject: Re: javadoc changes: have they broken xdoclet?

> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Steve Loughran <> wrote:

> (2) sourcepath elements that don't contain any .java files for
> packages we want to generate docs for will be dropped.
> The later one happens because all sourcepath, packagenames and
> excludepackages entries will now be munged into packagesets internally
> and only those sets that contain something interesting will be
> considered.

hmm, I wonder if there is a defect in how the notion of 'interesting' is

> I did a complete Gump run before I committed the changes and found
> that I had to trim the package names (the old code did so as well)
> because xml-security's buildfile has an - erm - interesting way to
> specify the packages.  I couldn't find any other problems, but that
> doesn't mean that there aren't any.

did you try doing a test run of our own xdoc proposal? It aint working no
more either.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message