ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org>
Subject Re: cullers
Date Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:06:04 GMT
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Jose Alberto Fernandez <j_a_fernandez@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> Why should <fileset> refer to an "existing set" of files?

Because this is what it does right now.  All tasks that support nested
<fileset>s will fail if they received non existent things from them.

Peter has already convinced me that you are talking about something
different form today's fileset, which doesn't mean I'd understand why
a set transformation had to be nested into a set definition, much less
why this would be "the proper place" for the transformation.

Stefan

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message