ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Donald <>
Subject Re: cullers
Date Wed, 27 Feb 2002 08:49:40 GMT
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:34, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Peter Donald <> wrote:
> > * FileSet is a set
> of existing files, agreed.

I disagree. A FileSet created from one of the existing scanners probably 
requires this but it is not inherent in the concept or the implementation 
that I can recall.

> If we want to extend it to a more general set, that is fine with me,
> but we'll have to rewrite lots of tasks as they rely on the "existing"
> bit above.

Not if they still aquire the fileset from scanners.

> > Hence we end up having extensions of Fileset to apply transformation
> > rather than a nested element. ie the Tarfileset has attributes to
> > apply a set of permissions to fileset.
> I wouldn't call this a transformation of the set, maybe this could be
> handled by a different concept <decorator> or something similar.

Maybe - I vaguely recall coming up with another name that you didn't mind in 
the past ... hmmm forget it atm ;)

> What I'm trying to stress is that <tarfileset> (which could be a
> <fileset> with a nested <decorator> that adds permissions) still
> consists of existing files, while a set that has been transformed by a
> <mapper> doesn't give the same guarantee - and it shouldn't.

Well I guess I disagree ;) See above. That may be the current implementation 
but there is nothing inherent in it that requires this.



"You know what a dumbshit the 'average man' on the street is? Well, by
definition, half of them are even dumber than that!"
					J.R. "Bob" Dobbs

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message