ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Magesh Umasankar" <>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Copy task recognizes URLs as file attributes
Date Tue, 27 Nov 2001 21:31:41 GMT

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote :

First of all, I am not against either approach, but...

> If you want to allow copy to take URLs then add 
> an "url" attribute for that. The original patch 
> already added a bunch of other attributes which are 
> specific to URLs.

From user's perspective, I want to copy one *file* to 
another place.  I do not want to copy a *url* to another 
place.  It just happens that I refer to the file to be 
copied using a url - aren't the following similar?


My point is why should the protocol matter?  Why *shouldn't* the attribute "file" be overloaded?


To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message