ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Erik Hatcher" <>
Subject Re: <available> / <condition> breaking immutability
Date Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:56:56 GMT

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Loughran" <>
> > to manually specify <tstamp>?!  :)   - this would actually make life a
> > easier so you could specify other properties relying on a datestamp
> > the first <target> declaration rather than having to have an 'init'
> > do this for you.
> makes sense, if they had names like, but
> would they be inherited in <ant>?

They should be user properties and hence carried forward by <ant>
automatically.  That seems reasonable to me.

> (*)hey, maybe, just maybe, we could make <tstamp> a sibling of target :-)

I thought of this also.  I'm not sure if one or both of these things should
be added or not.  I like the implicitly provided time stamps, but allowing
the user to define a custom date outside a target is a good thing also.  Any
reason not to add <tstamp> to the "special" tasks that can be outside


To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message