ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <>
Subject RE: Problem with WeblogicDeploymentTool & multiple entity beans
Date Tue, 03 Oct 2000 18:57:13 GMT
I am currently using ejbjar to build one jar file that contains multipule
beans (currently one entity and 1+ session beans) and it works fine.  I
just now ran into the problem when trying to add more than one entity
bean.  The problem is that WebLogic's weblogic-rdbms-bean xml file format
does not support more than one entity bean (rather silly if you ask me).

I was thinking about a mechanism to specify extra files to include in the
jar file.  WeblogicDeploymentTool could then use this information (tack on
the prefix that it is using) and include files that are available.


 On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Conor MacNeill wrote:

> Jason,
> ejbjar was originally intended to build 1 bean per jar. That is the way we
> use it and all deployment descriptors, both the standard one and the
> weblogic extension ones, are prefixed with the bean name.
> John Hall provided a patch to ejbjar to allow it to generate a single jar. I
> haven't used that capability, however, and I am not quite sure how it would
> handle your situation.
> Conor
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Dillon []
> > Sent: Tuesday, 3 October 2000 14:26
> > To:
> > Subject: Problem with WeblogicDeploymentTool & multiple entity beans
> >
> >
> > Hey, I noticed that the WeblogicDeploymentTool doesn't seem to have any
> > support for generating a jar file with more than one
> > *-weblogic-cmp-rdbms-jar.xml file.  It looks like WebLogic's cmp xml file
> > can only contain field mappings for one entity bean.  Thus you can not
> > build an ejb-jar file from ant if you have more than one enity bean.
> >
> > I was wondering what you think might be the best solution to this?  I was
> > thinking to just add something to WeblogicDeploymentTool, but I could see
> > that tools others might want to have other files included as well.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > --jason
> >

View raw message