ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Donald <>
Subject RE: Javadoc patch
Date Sun, 02 Jul 2000 23:26:14 GMT
At 08:57  3/7/00 +0930, you wrote:
>Is c:d:\path a valid path on DOSalike systems? I'd have thought
>c:;d:\path would be the way to express that; c:d:\path isn't really
>valid on anything, is it?

It is legal on unix. It refers to the three paths "c", "d" and "path" (the
\p --> p because escaped p is plain old everyday p :P).


| "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want |
| to test a man's character, give him power."          |
|       -Abraham Lincoln                               |

View raw message