shale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Craig McClanahan" <craig...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was --> Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions
Date Fri, 04 Aug 2006 22:04:01 GMT
On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I like shale-goodies for the group id and shale.goodies for the package
> name.


+1

Sean


Craig

On 8/4/06, Craig McClanahan <craigmcc@apache.org> wrote:
> > On 8/4/06, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > shale.goodies.petstore ?
> > > >
> > > > I like it except for one problem.  What is the maven group id?  If
> it
> > > > starts with shale, people browsing ibiblio might get confused and
> > > > wonder where the rest of the stuff is?
> > >
> > > The Maven groupId would probably be com.google.code.shale-goodies,
> > > since that's the domain name we "own".
> > >
> > > It doesn't necessarily have to match the package name.
> >
> >
> > The group-id in the pom we've been playing with for svn access has a
> groupId
> > of "shale-goodies", which seems a good enough identifier for our
> purposes.
> > Alternatively, reusing whatever top level package name we choose would
> also
> > be fine with me.
> >
> > --
> > > Wendy
> > >
> >
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message