shale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Craig McClanahan" <craig...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was --> Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions
Date Fri, 04 Aug 2006 04:38:42 GMT
Added.

Craig

On 8/3/06, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>
> gmail
>
> mwessendorf @
>
> gmail
>
> DOT
>
> com
>
> :)
>
> On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well the email list is not public atm.  That's probably the problem.
> > We could create a shell gmail account for the svn emails and have that
> > same account subscribed to the group.  Then set up forwarding.  That
> > should work.
> >
> > Which brings us to the issue of the list permissions.  One option is
> > to require the moderator approval to join the list (I believe that's
> > what its set to now.)  We could rubber stamp people who want to join
> > but also remove them if they're acting like assholes.  Or just let the
> > floodgates open.  The problem with the open flood gate approach is
> > that it would be hard to switch back to the other model if we changed
> > our mind.
> >
> > I'm not sure where I stand on this.  What does the rest of the group
> think?
> >
> > Sean
> >
> > On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <craigmcc@apache.org> wrote:
> > > On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Lets think on the package names a bit.
> > >
> > >
> > > OK.
> > >
> > >   I set up a google group for
> > > > us.  I tried adding the svn commit messages to the group but I'm not
> > > > sure that's possible.  Maybe we just add each "commiter" manually as
> > > > we go?
> > >
> > >
> > > Hmm ... looks like you have it set up right ... maybe commit mail
> isn't
> > > working yet.
> > >
> > > It also looks like we can only have one destination address for the
> commits.
> > >
> > > Sean
> > >
> > >
> > > Craig
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <craigmcc@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any reason why we can't use org.apache.shale for the package
> names
> > > > > > still?  I can't really think of a better package name off hand.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Using org.apache.shale.xxxxx would seem to create a false
> perception
> > > > that
> > > > > the goodies were actually a formal part of the Shale project, and
> would
> > > > > contradict the project description claim in that regard.  We
> should use
> > > > > "goodies" or "shalegoodies" or something like that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sean
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Craig
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <craigmcc@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm ok with shale-goodies as long as we can release
> artifacts as
> > > > > > > > different versions, etc.  I'm assuming that's the
case.  I
> think
> > > > we're
> > > > > > > > all curious about the google option so lets go ahead
with
> it.  We
> > > > can
> > > > > > > > always move it in a few months if it doesn't pan out.
 Right
> now
> > > > > > > > there;s just shale-petstore and it wouldn't be the
end of
> the
> > > > world to
> > > > > > > > lose the svn history if we had to move it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I set up a "maven/trunk/master-pom" analogous to what we
have
> in the
> > > > > > Apache
> > > > > > > repository ... you could set up shale-petstore/trunk to
make
> it
> > > > > > > independently branchable and so on.  We could even set
up a
> > > > "current"
> > > > > > > externals later.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We'll have to think about the package names (and Maven
> artifact ids)
> > > > > > here
> > > > > > > ... I used "shale-goodies:shale-goodies:1-SNAPSHOT" for
the
> initial
> > > > > > master
> > > > > > > pom, but haven't checked in any code yet.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > my gmail is sean.schofield
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Added.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sean
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ps. Google is also doing something cool which is allowing
> you to
> > > > host
> > > > > > > > your domain email through them.  There is a beta test
going
> on and
> > > > > > > > they accepted my application.  Something to consider
for
> folks who
> > > > > > > > have their own domain for business purposes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That is pretty cool.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Craig
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message