shale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Craig McClanahan" <craig...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was --> Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions
Date Thu, 03 Aug 2006 23:02:44 GMT
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Any reason why we can't use org.apache.shale for the package names
> still?  I can't really think of a better package name off hand.


Using org.apache.shale.xxxxx would seem to create a false perception that
the goodies were actually a formal part of the Shale project, and would
contradict the project description claim in that regard.  We should use
"goodies" or "shalegoodies" or something like that.

Sean


Craig

On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <craigmcc@apache.org> wrote:
> > On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm ok with shale-goodies as long as we can release artifacts as
> > > different versions, etc.  I'm assuming that's the case.  I think we're
> > > all curious about the google option so lets go ahead with it.  We can
> > > always move it in a few months if it doesn't pan out.  Right now
> > > there;s just shale-petstore and it wouldn't be the end of the world to
> > > lose the svn history if we had to move it.
> >
> >
> > I set up a "maven/trunk/master-pom" analogous to what we have in the
> Apache
> > repository ... you could set up shale-petstore/trunk to make it
> > independently branchable and so on.  We could even set up a "current"
> > externals later.
> >
> > We'll have to think about the package names (and Maven artifact ids)
> here
> > ... I used "shale-goodies:shale-goodies:1-SNAPSHOT" for the initial
> master
> > pom, but haven't checked in any code yet.
> >
> > my gmail is sean.schofield
> >
> >
> > Added.
> >
> > Sean
> > >
> > > ps. Google is also doing something cool which is allowing you to host
> > > your domain email through them.  There is a beta test going on and
> > > they accepted my application.  Something to consider for folks who
> > > have their own domain for business purposes.
> >
> >
> > That is pretty cool.
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message