shale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Reddin <gred...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was --> Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions
Date Thu, 03 Aug 2006 19:01:29 GMT
+1.  I was wanting to figure out what all that google open source  
stuff was about anyway.  But I'm cool with either google or java.net.

Greg

On Aug 3, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:

> I'm considering an option that Craig mentioned earlier - moving this
> to google's new open source area.  While I understand the reasons for
> the tight restrictions that ASF has, it makes it difficult to host a
> fully functional sample app using several different technologies.
>
> On google (and presumably dev.java.net), we can also distribute
> binaries wither hibernate, etc.  That will allow more people to use
> the app.  No matter how easy you make it, some people are just putoff
> by compiling their own source.  I admit, sometimes I fall into this
> category (if my interest is only casual.)
>
> If we do move it, I'd still like some loose integration between shale
> and this project.  This would include links to the shale-petstore from
> the shale site and referring people on the user list to the
> shale-petstore when it serves as an appropriate example.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Sean
>
> On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <craigmcc@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 8/3/06, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Most of the images seem to be: GNU Free Documentation License,  
>> Version
>> > > 1.2.  What about the text?  Any ideas on that?
>> >
>> > Are you asking about the text on Wikipedia?  There's a notice at  
>> the
>> > bottom of every page: "All text is available under the terms of the
>> > GNU Free Documentation License."
>> >
>> > As for whether we can use the text or images, if GFDL is not  
>> listed on
>> > Cliff's page [1] then I would ask on legal-discuss@.
>>
>>
>> I suspect the GNU license for docs will have issues, so asking on
>> legal-discuss would be a good idea.
>>
>> In the mean time, note that the original Blueprints PetStore  
>> application
>> (including content and images) is BSD-licensed, so we can use  
>> stuff from
>> there.  <https://blueprints.dev.java.net>)
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>
>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
>> >
>> > --
>> > Wendy
>> >
>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message