shale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sean Schofield" <sean.schofi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was --> Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions
Date Fri, 04 Aug 2006 21:09:44 GMT
I like shale-goodies for the group id and shale.goodies for the package name.

Sean

On 8/4/06, Craig McClanahan <craigmcc@apache.org> wrote:
> On 8/4/06, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > shale.goodies.petstore ?
> > >
> > > I like it except for one problem.  What is the maven group id?  If it
> > > starts with shale, people browsing ibiblio might get confused and
> > > wonder where the rest of the stuff is?
> >
> > The Maven groupId would probably be com.google.code.shale-goodies,
> > since that's the domain name we "own".
> >
> > It doesn't necessarily have to match the package name.
>
>
> The group-id in the pom we've been playing with for svn access has a groupId
> of "shale-goodies", which seems a good enough identifier for our purposes.
> Alternatively, reusing whatever top level package name we choose would also
> be fine with me.
>
> --
> > Wendy
> >
>
>
> Craig
>
>

Mime
View raw message