shale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sean Schofield" <sean.schofi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was --> Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions
Date Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:41:32 GMT
Any reason why we can't use org.apache.shale for the package names
still?  I can't really think of a better package name off hand.

Sean

On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <craigmcc@apache.org> wrote:
> On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm ok with shale-goodies as long as we can release artifacts as
> > different versions, etc.  I'm assuming that's the case.  I think we're
> > all curious about the google option so lets go ahead with it.  We can
> > always move it in a few months if it doesn't pan out.  Right now
> > there;s just shale-petstore and it wouldn't be the end of the world to
> > lose the svn history if we had to move it.
>
>
> I set up a "maven/trunk/master-pom" analogous to what we have in the Apache
> repository ... you could set up shale-petstore/trunk to make it
> independently branchable and so on.  We could even set up a "current"
> externals later.
>
> We'll have to think about the package names (and Maven artifact ids) here
> ... I used "shale-goodies:shale-goodies:1-SNAPSHOT" for the initial master
> pom, but haven't checked in any code yet.
>
> my gmail is sean.schofield
>
>
> Added.
>
> Sean
> >
> > ps. Google is also doing something cool which is allowing you to host
> > your domain email through them.  There is a beta test going on and
> > they accepted my application.  Something to consider for folks who
> > have their own domain for business purposes.
>
>
> That is pretty cool.
>
> Craig
>
>

Mime
View raw message