shale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sean Schofield" <sean.schofi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was --> Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions
Date Thu, 03 Aug 2006 19:26:20 GMT
And I just set up a shale-petstore ;-)

Do you envision this being more then the petstore app?  Also, are we
sure we want google as opposed to dev.java.net?  I don't know much
about the google option.

It seems like we can have discussion via a google group.  What about
distribution of jar files?

Sean

On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <craigmcc@apache.org> wrote:
> On 8/3/06, Greg Reddin <greddin@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1.  I was wanting to figure out what all that google open source
> > stuff was about anyway.  But I'm cool with either google or java.net.
>
>
> I just set up "shale-goodies" for us at Google[1].  Note that you must have
> a GMail account to log in with for SVN access, but that's already true for a
> bunch of us.  Send me your GMail username and I'll add you in as a project
> owner.
>
> Greg
>
>
> Craig
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies/
>
>
> On Aug 3, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
> >
> > > I'm considering an option that Craig mentioned earlier - moving this
> > > to google's new open source area.  While I understand the reasons for
> > > the tight restrictions that ASF has, it makes it difficult to host a
> > > fully functional sample app using several different technologies.
> > >
> > > On google (and presumably dev.java.net), we can also distribute
> > > binaries wither hibernate, etc.  That will allow more people to use
> > > the app.  No matter how easy you make it, some people are just putoff
> > > by compiling their own source.  I admit, sometimes I fall into this
> > > category (if my interest is only casual.)
> > >
> > > If we do move it, I'd still like some loose integration between shale
> > > and this project.  This would include links to the shale-petstore from
> > > the shale site and referring people on the user list to the
> > > shale-petstore when it serves as an appropriate example.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Sean
> > >
> > > On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <craigmcc@apache.org> wrote:
> > >> On 8/3/06, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Most of the images seem to be: GNU Free Documentation License,
> > >> Version
> > >> > > 1.2.  What about the text?  Any ideas on that?
> > >> >
> > >> > Are you asking about the text on Wikipedia?  There's a notice at
> > >> the
> > >> > bottom of every page: "All text is available under the terms of the
> > >> > GNU Free Documentation License."
> > >> >
> > >> > As for whether we can use the text or images, if GFDL is not
> > >> listed on
> > >> > Cliff's page [1] then I would ask on legal-discuss@.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I suspect the GNU license for docs will have issues, so asking on
> > >> legal-discuss would be a good idea.
> > >>
> > >> In the mean time, note that the original Blueprints PetStore
> > >> application
> > >> (including content and images) is BSD-licensed, so we can use
> > >> stuff from
> > >> there.  <https://blueprints.dev.java.net>)
> > >>
> > >> Craig
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> [1] http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Wendy
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message