From dev-return-860-apmail-serf-dev-archive=serf.apache.org@serf.apache.org Thu Nov 5 18:27:27 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-serf-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-serf-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4970E18362 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 18:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69398 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2015 18:27:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-serf-dev-archive@serf.apache.org Received: (qmail 69360 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2015 18:27:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@serf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@serf.apache.org Received: (qmail 69348 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2015 18:27:26 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 18:27:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8EC701A41AE for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 18:27:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.012 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.012 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.008, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OiyWgNO6l3q9 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 18:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1A323212A3 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 18:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wmll128 with SMTP id l128so21407429wml.0 for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 10:27:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=iJzuJn5TbZmZU4jsC3umQpsW8U0uNA8vXRoqLK7XcoM=; b=a79Hvh9TulaGyorx0iSmlp+BetsemJ5vYxq2LaPUxQ7wyeKDTydhfzFVV0KvL6Our1 GZaXxAUYmLNhLhuarYrMMgGXWQpsqkzVMuNtS1mVqjT0dC+9r6j14jkmVN2mdfk57s7C Ge3Dh4Y2miab866R427Ju4vfmrAvnz1cGvkFVLrgYQKETJ3zOxczoqFssfwxVXrn8qhV u/M8c92lkqJDxei9+kjZx+jkWA8ehk4iZc918FVOyMnsKgmuyqLS/uTSXqQj8AM7+2A8 zzZ3Rdzb1kN1tnPEbrNrqQcxNdvR+VgIHruYh36p1UDR/nXvmS5bPobgi/7Afv37m4tQ AErQ== X-Received: by 10.28.21.17 with SMTP id 17mr5609334wmv.82.1446748038905; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 10:27:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lieven.govaerts@gmail.com Received: by 10.27.210.76 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 10:26:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <09e601d117df$81ac17a0$850446e0$@qqmail.nl> References: <09e601d117df$81ac17a0$850446e0$@qqmail.nl> From: Lieven Govaerts Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 19:26:59 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dms5tL2jdRWU5uwmN19vwzRd5ZQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dedicated mailing list for buildbot notifications? To: Bert Huijben Cc: Ivan Zhakov , dev@serf.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Bert Huijben wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:ivan@visualsvn.com] >> Sent: donderdag 5 november 2015 16:31 >> To: dev@serf.apache.org >> Subject: Dedicated mailing list for buildbot notifications? >> >> I think it's worth to create separate mailing list for buildbot >> notifications. It's hard to follow commits and discussions when they >> are mixed with multiple notifications from buildbot about test >> failures. > > +1 > > I almost requested one when we moved to the ASF, but things were quiet back then and some others thought it wasn't necessary. Well, things were quiet back then, so the extra mailing list was not worth it. However, I agree that the bb notifications are obscuring normal commit messages, so +1 on a separate list. Lieven > Bert >