serf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lieven Govaerts <...@mobsol.be>
Subject Re: Short term release policy?
Date Tue, 01 Sep 2015 19:04:12 GMT
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Bert Huijben <bert@qqmail.nl> wrote:
>         Hi,
>
> I received a number of very good questions this morning:
> * Are we creating an announce@serf.apache.org mailinglist to announce serf
> releases?
>
> * Do we want to create future 1.3.x serf releases?
> * If yes, do we want to change the license on 1.3.x?

Why would we? Can't we focus on 1.4.0 instead?
Lieven

>
> * What is the status of the 1.4.0 release?
> - [Subversion checks for >= 1.4 to enable logging]
> - The function pointer inequality problem is not solved by just dropping one
> function (remaining support), but not the other (config support).
>
> - Would the release process be easier if we just go 2.0 and introduce a
> proper versioning scheme?
>
> Given that the current 1.4.x problem may already break existing linkage
> scenarios...
>
>
>         Bert
>

Mime
View raw message