ripple-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brent Lintner <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Ripple release 0.9.29
Date Wed, 13 May 2015 14:36:04 GMT
+1 - agreed on the vote.

On Tue, 12 May 2015 at 14:09 Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) <> wrote:

> +1, lets put it out for a vote. If we have any new features, we could
> always do a new release.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) []
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 10:02 AM
> To:
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Ripple release 0.9.29
> Once again, thank you for your work on this. The first release is always
> the hardest because nobody has done the helpful stuff like adding a jake
> task for RAT - great stuff!
> I've not reviewed the package at this point, but based on the fact I did a
> thorough review of the last package I'm all for you putting this up for a
> vote.
> Ross
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Barham []
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 9:45 PM
> To:
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Ripple release 0.9.29
> Based on feedback from our last attempt at a release, I believe the only
> change we *need* to make for a release is to reinstate the
> XMLHttpRequest.js license in LICENSE, updating it to point to the correct
> version (that was released under the Apache 2.0). However, we've also had
> some useful fixes over the weeks since 0.9.28, so it will be nice to
> include them. In addition to those changes, I've done the following today:
> 1. Merged Julian's PR that updates our bower and jsdom so Ripple
> successfully installs and builds with Node 0.11.0 and higher.
> 2. Added a new jake task - 'jake rat' - that runs Apache RAT to verify
> license headers in the project (verifies all files that should have license
> headers do, that they recognized, and of a type acceptable in an Apache
> project). This will make it easier for team members to verify a release is
> clean in this regard (note that since it runs against your local repo, you
> need to sync your repo to the release tag the run). Running 'jake rat'
> should be completely clean at this point, as I've configured it to exclude
> files with license headers it doesn't recognize, but that we have agreed
> are fine.
> 3. Updated package.json and doc/ for version 0.9.29 and added
> a 0.9.29 tag.
> I've created an archive package if anyone wants to check it out, but
> haven't done any verification on it yet. It can be found here:
> Anyone have any issues with moving forward with a vote thread for this
> release?
> Thanks!
> Tim

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message