portals-jetspeed-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Timony, Michael" <Michael.Tim...@FMR.COM>
Subject RE: 2.1 customized binary build
Date Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:38:12 GMT
Maven 1 may be easier, but the Maven people appear to be recommending
that people move to Maven 2 and get off Maven 1. I would worry that
Maven 1 is not being updated and maintained as well as Maven 2 is?

Also, we're creating our builds with Maven2 and have to go back to
Maven1 could cause us (and our developers) a lot of pain.

Mick Timony

-----Original Message-----
From: David Sean Taylor [mailto:david@bluesunrise.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 2:37 PM
To: Jetspeed Developers List
Subject: Re: 2.1 customized binary build


On Mar 20, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Aaron Evans wrote:

> On 3/20/07, David Sean Taylor <david@bluesunrise.com> wrote:
>>
>> The build isn't going to pick it up unless you put the dependencies 
>> in your project.xml (maven-1) Are you doing a building with a custom 
>> Maven-1 build? (btw I will be proposing deprecating Maven-1 build 
>> soon...)
>
> I am using the standard maven-1 binary  build using the plugin. I do 
> realize you guys want to standardize on 2 and I understand why.
> Unfortunate though because it works so well. ;-)

Just a proposal ... we can all vote on where we want to go from here Im
happy to continue with Maven-1 if thats what people want However Im not
happy to continue with two builds




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-help@portals.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-help@portals.apache.org


Mime
View raw message