portals-jetspeed-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roger Ruttimann <roger.ruttim...@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: Reorganizing Jetspeed repository (Was Re: Some mean-spirited whining about the build...)
Date Tue, 03 Jan 2006 00:47:02 GMT
Raphaël Luta wrote:

>Roger Ruttimann wrote:
>  
>
>>Raphaël Luta wrote:
>><snip>
>>    
>>
>>>>>and then vote and implement the proposal.
>>>>>Maybe we could start a poropsal draft on the wiki to start
>>>>>formalizing a
>>>>>precise proposal while the discussion goes on.
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>I'm all for working through the issues but I also wonder if bighting off
>>>>one peice at a time is worth considering.  I'm affraid that addressing
>>>>things like the mailing lists and redoing builds, and reorganizing
>>>>directory structures within jetspeed is more than is required right now.
>>>>
>>>>Simply moving the applications directory is a first step in the right
>>>>direction and it gives us a chance to "try" things out before taking on
>>>>a much larger effort (modifying the build, etc. . .).
>>>>
>>>>Can we vote and begin to play with applications so that we have some
>>>>"working knowledge" for the rest of our discussions?
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>If there's a consensus from the current active developers to go this way
>>>and move applications as a test, I'm definitely +1 but then I'm not
>>>active very often on the code so I'm not really the one impacted.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>How much work is involved in setting up a subversion project for
>>applications? If we all agree to move applications into it's own
>>repository we should go ahead instead of doing it in baby steps which
>>might be confusing to portal users/developers.
>>
>>I volunteer to step-in in creating and maintaining the applications
>>subproject (svn/jira).
>>
>>    
>>
>
>If we're talking just moving SVN to /portals/applications and having the
>commits made to current jetspeed-dev list then the work is very small
>(just a svn move and some svn configuration edit done by Santiago). The
>main issue possibly being that applications can be built alone, without
>being included in the jetspeed-2 tree.
>
>  
>
I don't think this is a big deal. Just having the dependencies figured out.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@portals.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-help@portals.apache.org


Mime
View raw message