portals-jetspeed-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Todd Kuebler <tkueb...@cisco.com>
Subject Re: [Bug 18865] - [Enhancement] MVC Portlet Action Life Cycle
Date Mon, 14 Apr 2003 19:29:48 GMT

I have a document including a full example I'm working on that I can 
contribute in a couple of weeks.

-tk

At 12:07 PM 4/14/2003 -0700, David Sean Taylor wrote:

>On Monday, April 14, 2003, at 09:51  AM, Weaver, Scott wrote:
>
>>>Is there documentation anywhere on how to use the new MVC portlets?
>>>Looking at PortletActionEvent, there is a method "fireEvent" that has
>>>no java docs on how it works ( alluding to a message on the other dev
>>>list ;-)
>>
>>Ouch!  I already I said was no angel when it comes to documentation, but 
>>it does say "Convenience method for firing portlet events." ;)
>
>hey now, if we can dish it out, we can take it too ;-)
>(note: you have to be on another mailing list that Scott and I are members 
>of to appreciate this joke)
>
>yes, but the params are still a mystery to me....
>
>>
>>>Im walking thru the code, trying to figure out how this all works.
>>>It seems that the MVC is trying to call the action from within
>>>BuildNormalContext, which is too late IMO.
>>>The action phase should occur before any rendering starts.
>>>Anyway, if we can get a portlet from within an action event, that would
>>>be a great improvement, even though the phasing is out of sync.
>>
>>The action is called from the buildContent() method which is invoked by 
>>the standard getContent() method defined in the GenericMVCPortlet, not 
>>within the buildNormalContext() of the action.  This is done prior to the 
>>view processor's handling of the appropriate template, so the action 
>>phase is completed prior to rendering, with the context fully populated.
>
>Don't get me wrong . I really welcome the MVC, It just doesn't seem right 
>to have the getContent() method is invoking actions.
>Its good that the action phase completes for this particular portlet 
>before the render phase, but i would prefer that it completes before all 
>portlet's render phases.
>
>
>>The only way this fails is if the action is not being invoked directly by 
>>the GenericMVCPortlet, i.e. you are passing in an "action" parameter 
>>either through a url or form field and not relying on the value provided 
>>within the registry definition.  Which I have a feeling is what is 
>>happening in your case, am I correct?
>Well considering I have lots of actions written prior to 
>GenericMVCPortlet, would be safe to say that they will all fail...
>This leaves at them at the exact state they were in before MVC portlet, 
>they can't access the portlet.
>Could you quickly describe how I should port my actions so that they work 
>correctly in MVC?
>
>>I'll definitely try and whip up some documentation on the MVC portlets.
>+1
>
>--
>David Sean Taylor
>Bluesunrise Software
>david@bluesunrise.com
>+01 707 773-4646
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message