portals-jetspeed-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Sean Taylor" <da...@bluesunrise.com>
Subject RE: turbine-2.2-b3
Date Fri, 23 Aug 2002 14:36:32 GMT

Its a transition to a different security model. Portals have different
requirements for security models, and they seem to differ with every
We didn't want to be tied into one security model (Turbine), so we decoupled
and removed it, and refactored the security model and moved towards a more
pluggable solution.


For the Turbine implementation, all the OM classes are now generated by
Torque, which makes it much easier to modify the object model.
For example the default Authentication service does use the 'Turbine'-like
model, but the default Authorization service does not.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Poeschl [mailto:mpoeschl@marmot.at]
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 5:29 AM
> To: Jetspeed Developers List
> Subject: Re: turbine-2.2-b3
> why does jetspeed have it's own security stuff?????
> (it lokks like you are duplicating stuff :-(( )
> martin
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:jetspeed-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:jetspeed-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>

View raw message