phoenix-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From anil gupta <anilgupt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Excessive region splitting of Global Index table(8 Megabyte regions)
Date Sat, 12 Mar 2016 20:45:11 GMT
Ok, Oversight on my side. MAX_FILESIZE => '11994435' for the secondary
index table.
Main table still doesnt shows MAX_FILESIZE attribute.

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:41 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org>
wrote:

> It should show up for the index table. I did a test on my local HBase, and
> this is what I see:
>
> hbase(main):004:0> describe 'FOO_IDX'
> Table FOO_IDX is ENABLED
>
> FOO_IDX, {TABLE_ATTRIBUTES => {MAX_FILESIZE => '6710886400', ...
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:36 PM, anil gupta <anilgupta84@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> 8GB setting of region size is set at the cluster level. So, we havent set
>> MAX_FILESIZE in main table explicitly. I ran the describe statement for
>> both tables but its not showing up MAX_FILESIZE since we didnt do any
>> custom setting to these tables. Hope this makes sense.
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:26 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok - before you reset the MAX_FILESIZE, it'd be help if you could open
>>> an HBase shell and let us know what the current values are for your data
>>> table and index table:
>>>
>>> describe YOUR_DATA_TABLE;
>>> describe YOUR_INDEX_TABLE;
>>>
>>> If your data table is 8GB, I'd guess your index should be 4GB at the
>>> smallest. I think 1GB would be too low.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> James
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:23 PM, anil gupta <anilgupta84@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the reply, James. We have 2 global secondary index in this
>>>> table and both of them exhibit same behavior.  Going to give your
>>>> suggestion a try. I also think that regionsize for secondary index should
>>>> not be 8GB. Will try to set the regionsize=1GB for secondary index and see
>>>> how it goes.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:00 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Anil,
>>>>> Phoenix estimates the ratio between the data table and index table as
>>>>> shown below to attempt to get the same number of splits in your index
table
>>>>> as your data table.
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>>  * Approximate ratio between index table size and data table size:
>>>>>  * More or less equal to the ratio between the number of key value
>>>>>  * columns in each. We add one to the key value column count to
>>>>>  * take into account our empty key value. We add 1/4 for any key
>>>>>  * value data table column that was moved into the index table row key.
>>>>>  */
>>>>>
>>>>> Phoenix then multiples the MAX_FILESIZE of the data table to come up
>>>>> with a reasonable default value for the index table. Can you check in
the
>>>>> HBase shell what the MAX_FILESIZE is for the data table versus the index
>>>>> table? Maybe there's a bug in Phoenix in how it calculates this ration.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can override the MAX_FILESIZE for your index through an ALTER
>>>>> TABLE statement:
>>>>>
>>>>> ALTER TABLE my_table_schema.my_index_name SET MAX_FILESIZE=8589934592
>>>>>
>>>>> You can ignore the warnings you get in sqlline and you can verify the
>>>>> setting took affect through the HBase shell by running the following
>>>>> command:
>>>>>
>>>>> describe 'MY_TABLE_SCHEMA.MY_INDEX_NAME'
>>>>>
>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>
>>>>>     James
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:18 AM, anil gupta <anilgupta84@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are using HDP2.3.4 and Phoenix4.4.
>>>>>> Our global index table is doing excessive splitting. Our cluster
>>>>>> region size setting is 8 Gigabytes but global index table has 18
regions
>>>>>> and max size of region is 10.9 MB.
>>>>>> This is definitely not a good behavior. I looked into tuning (
>>>>>> https://phoenix.apache.org/tuning.html) and i could not find
>>>>>> anything relevant. Is this region splitting intentionally done by
Phoenix
>>>>>> for secondary index tables?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is the output of du command:
>>>>>> [ag@hdpclient1 ~]$ hadoop fs -du -h
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX
>>>>>> 761     /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/.tabledesc
>>>>>> 0       /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/.tmp
>>>>>> 9.3 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/079db2c953c30a8270ecbd52582e81ff
>>>>>> 2.9 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/0952c070234c05888bfc2a01645e9e88
>>>>>> 10.9 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/0d69bbb8991b868f0437b624410e9bed
>>>>>> 8.2 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/206562491fd1de9db48cf422dd8c2059
>>>>>> 7.9 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/25318837ab8e1db6922f5081c840d2e7
>>>>>> 9.5 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/5369e0d6526b3d2cdab9937cb320ccb3
>>>>>> 9.6 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/62704ee3c9418f0cd48210a747e1f8ac
>>>>>> 7.8 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/631376fc5515d7785b2bcfc8a1f64223
>>>>>> 2.8 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/6648d5396ba7a3c3bf884e5e1300eb0e
>>>>>> 9.4 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/6e6e133580aea9a19a6b3ea643735072
>>>>>> 8.1 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/8535a5c8a0989dcdfad2b1e9e9f3e18c
>>>>>> 7.8 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/8ffa32e0c6357c2a0b413f3896208439
>>>>>> 9.3 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/c27e2809cd352e3b06c0f11d3e7278c6
>>>>>> 8.0 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/c4f5a98ce6452a6b5d052964cc70595a
>>>>>> 8.1 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/c578d3190363c32032b4d92c8d307215
>>>>>> 7.9 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/d750860bac8aa372eb28aaf055ea63e7
>>>>>> 9.6 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/e9756aa4c7c8b9bfcd0857b43ad5bfbe
>>>>>> 8.0 M
>>>>>> /apps/hbase/data/data/default/SEC_INDEX/ebaae6c152e82c9b74c473babaf644dd
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>> Anil Gupta
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>> Anil Gupta
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Anil Gupta
>>
>
>


-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Anil Gupta

Mime
View raw message