Until the CDH distro moves off of 1.0, we'll likely want to continue releasing Phoenix on top of it (even if there are no further HBase 1.0 releases). That's assuming our CDH Phoenix users want the new features and bug fixes we're developing.On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Andrew Purtell <email@example.com> wrote:That's my understanding as well.--On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Nick Dimiduk <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:FYI, HBase has recently decided to discontinue the 1.0.x line. I believe the pending 1.0.3 release is expected to be the last.On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:36 AM, James Taylor <email@example.com> wrote:Thanks for letting us know, Anirudha & James. Makes sense to keep the 1.0 branch going in light of this hard dependency you have.JamesOn Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Anirudha Khanna <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Same for us, we are also using CDH5 and it would be a big setback if HBase-1.0 support is stopped by the community.AnirudhaOn Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:01 PM, James Heather <email@example.com> wrote:We're using CDH5, which runs HBase 1.0.
I think it would kill the whole Phoenix project for us if there were no 1.0 support.
On 19/09/15 01:53, James Taylor wrote:
Please let us know if you're counting on HBase 1.0 support given that we have HBase 1.1 support.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Seems like a better question for the users mailing list. Probably it
depends on where the vendors are going, if there will be a long-running
1.0.x release line, we should keep it around. From Apache perspective, it's
probably fine to drop 1.0.x in favor of 1.1.x. HBase 1.2 is right around
the corner too...
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor <email@example.com>
> Given that we have Phoenix support for HBase 1.1, does anyone feel like we
> need to continue with Phoenix releases for HBase 1.0?
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)