phoenix-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Heather <james.heat...@mendeley.com>
Subject Re: setting up community repo of Phoenix for CDH5?
Date Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:14:08 GMT
I imagine Dhruv meant the script or whatever you used to build the 
parcel. Is that available? Could we put it into the repo so that we can 
build parcels as and when we need them? That would be great.

James

On 12/10/15 15:49, Jean-Marc Spaggiari wrote:
> Hi Dhruv,
>
> The sources are exactly what Andrew has pushed into the GitHub. I have 
> not done any modification to the code. Have you tried to clone and 
> build what he sent?
>
> JM
>
> 2015-10-12 7:14 GMT-04:00 Dhruv Gohil <yourfrienddhruv@gmail.com 
> <mailto:yourfrienddhruv@gmail.com>>:
>
>     Hi JM,
>         Can you please share the source code of how to build 'the
>     parcel' ?
>         We want to package our owned patched phoenix as parcel for
>     different CDH version.
>         Will love to share custom CDH parcels like we already do for
>     HDP
>     (http://hortonworks-gallery.github.io/index.html?sort=asc&filter=ambari%20extensions)
>
>     Thanks for the awesome work!
>
>     Also,
>         Has anybody had success with this parcel? (we don't yet have
>     compatible CDH cluster yet, so waiting for any one guy's go ahead
>     to do so) ;-)
>
>
>     On Thursday 08 October 2015 10:37 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari wrote:
>>     Can you try this repo for your installation?
>>
>>     http://server.distparser.com:81/parcels/
>>
>>     Don't look at the name of the files... Even if it says 4.3.0 it's
>>     4.5.2 inside. Install is and launch the Phoenix command line to
>>     validate it.
>>
>>     Please be aware that it's not at all supported by cloudera in
>>     anyway, not approved by them nor provided by them nor anything
>>     else by them ;)
>>
>>     Those parcels work for me. I'm sure they will for you too. Please
>>     keep me posted.
>>
>>     JM
>>
>>     2015-10-07 11:55 GMT-04:00 Kevin Verhoeven
>>     <Kevin.Verhoeven@ds-iq.com <mailto:Kevin.Verhoeven@ds-iq.com>>:
>>
>>         JM,
>>
>>         If possible, I’d also like to try your 4.5.2 Parcel. Any luck
>>         with Cloudera? This would be very useful if made available.
>>         Thanks for your time!
>>
>>         Kevin
>>
>>         *From:*James Heather [mailto:james.heather@mendeley.com
>>         <mailto:james.heather@mendeley.com>]
>>         *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2015 5:22 AM
>>         *To:* user@phoenix.apache.org <mailto:user@phoenix.apache.org>
>>         *Subject:* Re: setting up community repo of Phoenix for CDH5?
>>
>>         Hi JM,
>>
>>         Is there a way of getting hold of the parcel you built? I'm
>>         keen to try it!
>>
>>         Best wishes,
>>
>>         James
>>
>>         On 21/09/15 14:00, Jean-Marc Spaggiari wrote:
>>
>>             Hi James,
>>
>>             I have been able to build a parcel and installed it on my
>>             own cluster. Build it with 4.5.2 that Andrew modified.
>>             I'm in touch with Cloudera to see what's the next steps.
>>             I will let you know very shortly...
>>
>>             JM
>>
>>             2015-09-21 6:25 GMT-04:00 James Heather
>>             <james.heather@mendeley.com
>>             <mailto:james.heather@mendeley.com>>:
>>
>>                 @JM how did you get on with the parcel building?
>>
>>                 Has anyone managed to get 4.5 working on CDH5 now? I
>>                 was going to stick with 4.3 on our cluster until we
>>                 had a parcel, but I'm now needing to use pherf, and
>>                 that doesn't seem to exist in 4.3.
>>
>>                 James
>>
>>                 On 16/09/15 12:46, Jean-Marc Spaggiari wrote:
>>
>>                     @James: I'm working on the parcel building ;) If
>>                     not me I will try to find someone to do it. Stay
>>                     tuned.
>>
>>                     @Andrewy: It works for me that way, cool! I just
>>                     have a signature issue where it says I have no
>>                     signature. Will that be an issue?
>>
>>                     Thanks all,
>>
>>                     JM
>>
>>                     2015-09-16 3:24 GMT-04:00 James Heather
>>                     <james.heather@mendeley.com
>>                     <mailto:james.heather@mendeley.com>>:
>>
>>                         Great! Thank you!
>>
>>                         I'd wondered about parcel building. It did
>>                         look as though a parcel is just a .tgz,
>>                         containing the classes and a few bits of
>>                         meta, so hopefully it's doable. It would be
>>                         really nice if we could provide a working 4.5
>>                         parcel.
>>
>>                         James
>>
>>                         On 16 Sep 2015 01:02, "Andrew Purtell"
>>                         <apurtell@apache.org
>>                         <mailto:apurtell@apache.org>> wrote:
>>
>>                             I used dev/make_rc.sh, built with Maven
>>                             3.2.2, Java 7u79. Ubuntu build host.
>>
>>                             On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:58 PM,
>>                             Jean-Marc Spaggiari
>>                             <jean-marc@spaggiari.org
>>                             <mailto:jean-marc@spaggiari.org>> wrote:
>>
>>                                 No, I don't know why. I will ask and
>>                                 see if I can get a respons on that. I
>>                                 have also started the thread for the
>>                                 Parcel. I will see if I find enough
>>                                 help to work on that.
>>
>>                                 Regarding the branch you made, I
>>                                 tried to build it but got the error
>>                                 below. what's the command to build it?
>>
>>                                 Thanks,
>>
>>                                 JM
>>
>>                                 [INFO]
>>                                 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>                                 [ERROR] FATAL ERROR
>>                                 [INFO]
>>                                 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>                                 [INFO] null
>>                                 [INFO]
>>                                 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>                                 [INFO] Trace
>>                                 java.lang.NullPointerException
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.report.DefaultReporterFactory.mergeFromOtherFactories(DefaultReporterFactory.java:82)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.booterclient.ForkStarter.run(ForkStarter.java:182)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.AbstractSurefireMojo.executeProvider(AbstractSurefireMojo.java:1019)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.AbstractSurefireMojo.executeAfterPreconditionsChecked(AbstractSurefireMojo.java:853)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.AbstractSurefireMojo.execute(AbstractSurefireMojo.java:751)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultPluginManager.java:490)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:694)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithLifecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:556)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:535)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHandleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:387)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegments(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:348)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:180)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:328)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:138)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:362)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.apache.maven.cli.compat.CompatibleMain.main(CompatibleMain.java:60)
>>                                     at
>>                                 sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>>                                 Method)
>>                                     at
>>                                 sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>>                                     at
>>                                 sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>                                     at
>>                                 java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430)
>>                                     at
>>                                 org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
>>                                 [INFO]
>>                                 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>                                 [INFO] Total time: 2 minutes 17 seconds
>>                                 [INFO] Finished at: Tue Sep 15
>>                                 19:55:03 EDT 2015
>>                                 [INFO] Final Memory: 134M/1648M
>>                                 [INFO]
>>                                 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>                                 2015-09-15 19:55 GMT-04:00 Andrew
>>                                 Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>>                                 <mailto:apurtell@apache.org>>:
>>
>>                                     Cool, thanks J-M.
>>
>>                                     Do you know why support for query
>>                                     tracing was removed? If it's just
>>                                     a matter of porting it to the
>>                                     HTrace that ships with CDH, I can
>>                                     look at that.
>>
>>                                     On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:49 PM,
>>                                     Jean-Marc Spaggiari
>>                                     <jean-marc@spaggiari.org
>>                                     <mailto:jean-marc@spaggiari.org>>
>>                                     wrote:
>>
>>                                         Nice! I will see if there is
>>                                         a way to build a parcel from
>>                                         that the same way there is a
>>                                         parcel for Apache Phoenix 4.3
>>                                         in Cloudera Labs... Will
>>                                         clone what you did and try to
>>                                         build it locally...
>>
>>                                         2015-09-15 19:45 GMT-04:00
>>                                         Andrew Purtell
>>                                         <andrew.purtell@gmail.com
>>                                         <mailto:andrew.purtell@gmail.com>>:
>>
>>                                             I pushed updates to
>>                                             branch 4.5-HBase-1.0-cdh5
>>                                             and the tag
>>                                             v4.5.2-cdh5.4.5
>>                                             (1fcb5cf). This is the
>>                                             pending Phoenix 4.5.2
>>                                             release, currently at
>>                                             RC1, likely to pass, that
>>                                             will build against CDH
>>                                             5.4.5. If you want
>>                                             release tarballs I built
>>                                             from this, get them here:
>>
>>                                                 Binary:
>>                                             http://apurtell.s3.amazonaws.com/phoenix/phoenix-4.5.2-cdh5.4.5-bin.tar.gz
>>
>>                                                 Source:
>>                                             http://apurtell.s3.amazonaws.com/phoenix/phoenix-4.5.2-cdh5.4.5-src.tar.gz
>>
>>
>>                                             ​The source and these
>>                                             binaries incorporate
>>                                             changes from the Cloudera
>>                                             Labs fork of Phoenix
>>                                             (https://github.com/cloudera-labs/phoenix),
>>                                             licensed under the ASL
>>                                             v2, Neither the source or
>>                                             binary artifacts are in
>>                                             any way "official" or
>>                                             supported by the Apache
>>                                             Phoenix project. The
>>                                             source and artifacts are
>>                                             provided by me in a
>>                                             personal capacity for the
>>                                             convenience of would-be
>>                                             Phoenix users that also
>>                                             use CDH 5.4(.5). Please
>>                                             don't contact the Apache
>>                                             Phoenix project for any
>>                                             issues regarding this
>>                                             source and these binaries.
>>
>>                                             ​
>>
>>                                             On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at
>>                                             10:52 AM, James Heather
>>                                             <james.heather@mendeley.com
>>                                             <mailto:james.heather@mendeley.com>>
>>                                             wrote:
>>
>>                                                 Done! Thanks for helping!
>>
>>                                                 The branches in the
>>                                                 repo mirror those in
>>                                                 vanilla Phoenix. We
>>                                                 shouldn't push any
>>                                                 changes to the
>>                                                 vanilla branches, but
>>                                                 only to "*-cdh5"
>>                                                 branches (or any
>>                                                 temporary side
>>                                                 branches we need to
>>                                                 create).
>>
>>                                                 The issue tracker
>>                                                 will be very useful, yes.
>>
>>                                                 James
>>
>>                                                 On 14/09/15 17:22,
>>                                                 Andrew Purtell wrote:
>>
>>                                                     This is great James.
>>
>>                                                     Since this is
>>                                                     conveniently on
>>                                                     Github, maybe we
>>                                                     use the issue
>>                                                     tracker there?
>>                                                     Interested
>>                                                     parties can set a
>>                                                     watch. Would you
>>                                                     be willing to add
>>                                                     'apurtell' as a
>>                                                     collaborator on
>>                                                     the repo? I will
>>                                                     fork and send
>>                                                     over PRs of
>>                                                     course, but you
>>                                                     might want help?
>>
>>
>>                                                     On Sep 14, 2015,
>>                                                     at 6:21 AM, James
>>                                                     Heather
>>                                                     <james.heather@mendeley.com
>>                                                     <mailto:james.heather@mendeley.com>>
>>                                                     wrote:
>>
>>                                                         I've set up a
>>                                                         repo at
>>
>>                                                         https://github.com/chiastic-security/phoenix-for-cloudera
>>
>>                                                         It is a fork
>>                                                         of the
>>                                                         vanilla
>>                                                         Phoenix
>>                                                         github
>>                                                         mirror. I've
>>                                                         created a
>>                                                         branch called
>>                                                         "4.5-HBase-1.0-cdh5",
>>                                                         which we can
>>                                                         use for
>>                                                         making a
>>                                                         CDH5-compatible
>>                                                         version. I've
>>                                                         not made any
>>                                                         of the
>>                                                         necessary
>>                                                         changes so far.
>>
>>                                                         I chose that
>>                                                         branch, by
>>                                                         the way,
>>                                                         because it's
>>                                                         the latest
>>                                                         release, and
>>                                                         is using the
>>                                                         same version
>>                                                         of HBase as
>>                                                         CDH5.4. The
>>                                                         master branch
>>                                                         of the
>>                                                         Phoenix repo
>>                                                         is building a
>>                                                         snapshot of
>>                                                         (the
>>                                                         forthcoming)
>>                                                         Phoenix 4.6,
>>                                                         against HBase
>>                                                         1.1...
>>                                                         presumably
>>                                                         there will
>>                                                         also be a
>>                                                         Phoenix 4.6
>>                                                         for HBase 1.0?
>>
>>                                                         I'm not
>>                                                         certain of
>>                                                         the best way
>>                                                         to manage
>>                                                         this. Perhaps
>>                                                         we need a new
>>                                                         mailing list
>>                                                         for those who
>>                                                         want to help,
>>                                                         to avoid
>>                                                         cluttering
>>                                                         this list up.
>>
>>                                                         James
>>
>>                                                         On 13/09/15
>>                                                         02:54,
>>                                                         Jean-Marc
>>                                                         Spaggiari wrote:
>>
>>                                                             Exact.
>>                                                             There is
>>                                                             some some
>>                                                             code
>>                                                             change
>>                                                             because
>>                                                             of what
>>                                                             has been
>>                                                             back
>>                                                             ported
>>                                                             into CDH
>>                                                             and what
>>                                                             has not
>>                                                             been. But
>>                                                             overall,
>>                                                             it should
>>                                                             not be
>>                                                             rocket
>>                                                             science.
>>                                                             Mostly
>>                                                             method
>>                                                             signatures...
>>
>>                                                             Let us
>>                                                             know when
>>                                                             the repo
>>                                                             is
>>                                                             available
>>                                                             so we can
>>                                                             help...
>>
>>                                                             Thanks,
>>
>>                                                             JM
>>
>>                                                             2015-09-12 18:38
>>                                                             GMT-04:00
>>                                                             Krishna
>>                                                             <research800@gmail.com
>>                                                             <mailto:research800@gmail.com>>:
>>
>>                                                                 As
>>                                                                 explained
>>                                                                 here,
>>                                                                 there
>>                                                                 are
>>                                                                 some
>>                                                                 code
>>                                                                 changes
>>                                                                 too
>>                                                                 in
>>                                                                 addition
>>                                                                 to
>>                                                                 pom
>>                                                                 related
>>                                                                 changes.
>>
>>                                                                 http://stackoverflow.com/a/31934434/165130
>>
>>
>>
>>                                                                 On
>>                                                                 Friday,
>>                                                                 September
>>                                                                 11,
>>                                                                 2015,
>>                                                                 Andrew Purtell
>>                                                                 <andrew.purtell@gmail.com
>>                                                                 <mailto:andrew.purtell@gmail.com>>
>>                                                                 wrote:
>>
>>                                                                     Or once
>>                                                                     parameterized,
>>                                                                     add
>>                                                                     a
>>                                                                     default
>>                                                                     off
>>                                                                     profile
>>                                                                     that
>>                                                                     redefines
>>                                                                     them
>>                                                                     all
>>                                                                     in one
>>                                                                     shot
>>                                                                     after
>>                                                                     the
>>                                                                     builder
>>                                                                     activates
>>                                                                     the
>>                                                                     profile
>>                                                                     on the
>>                                                                     maven
>>                                                                     command
>>                                                                     line
>>                                                                     with
>>                                                                     -P ...
>>
>>
>>
>>                                                                     On Sep
>>                                                                     11,
>>                                                                     2015,
>>                                                                     at 7:05
>>                                                                     AM,
>>                                                                     Andrew
>>                                                                     Purtell
>>                                                                     <andrew.purtell@gmail.com
>>                                                                     <mailto:andrew.purtell@gmail.com>>
>>                                                                     wrote:
>>
>>                                                                         The
>>                                                                         group
>>                                                                         IDs
>>                                                                         and
>>                                                                         versions
>>                                                                         can
>>                                                                         be
>>                                                                         parameterized
>>                                                                         in
>>                                                                         the
>>                                                                         POM
>>                                                                         so
>>                                                                         they
>>                                                                         can
>>                                                                         be
>>                                                                         overridden
>>                                                                         on
>>                                                                         the
>>                                                                         maven
>>                                                                         command
>>                                                                         line
>>                                                                         with
>>                                                                         -D.
>>                                                                         That
>>                                                                         would
>>                                                                         be
>>                                                                         easy
>>                                                                         and
>>                                                                         something
>>                                                                         I think
>>                                                                         we
>>                                                                         could
>>                                                                         get
>>                                                                         committed
>>                                                                         without
>>                                                                         any
>>                                                                         controversy.
>>
>>
>>
>>                                                                         On
>>                                                                         Sep
>>                                                                         11,
>>                                                                         2015,
>>                                                                         at
>>                                                                         6:53
>>                                                                         AM,
>>                                                                         James
>>                                                                         Heather
>>                                                                         <james.heather@mendeley.com
>>                                                                         <mailto:james.heather@mendeley.com>>
>>                                                                         wrote:
>>
>>                                                                             Yes,
>>                                                                             my
>>                                                                             plan
>>                                                                             is
>>                                                                             to
>>                                                                             create
>>                                                                             a fork
>>                                                                             of
>>                                                                             the
>>                                                                             main
>>                                                                             repo,
>>                                                                             so
>>                                                                             that
>>                                                                             we
>>                                                                             can
>>                                                                             still
>>                                                                             merge
>>                                                                             new
>>                                                                             Phoenix
>>                                                                             code
>>                                                                             into
>>                                                                             the
>>                                                                             CDH-compatible
>>                                                                             version.
>>
>>                                                                             Before
>>                                                                             that,
>>                                                                             I do
>>                                                                             wonder
>>                                                                             whether
>>                                                                             it's
>>                                                                             possible
>>                                                                             to
>>                                                                             suggest
>>                                                                             a few
>>                                                                             changes
>>                                                                             to
>>                                                                             the
>>                                                                             main
>>                                                                             repo
>>                                                                             that
>>                                                                             would
>>                                                                             allow
>>                                                                             for
>>                                                                             compiling
>>                                                                             a CDH-compatible
>>                                                                             version,
>>                                                                             without
>>                                                                             needing
>>                                                                             to
>>                                                                             maintain
>>                                                                             a separate
>>                                                                             repo.
>>                                                                             The
>>                                                                             bulk
>>                                                                             of
>>                                                                             the
>>                                                                             changes
>>                                                                             are
>>                                                                             to
>>                                                                             dependencies
>>                                                                             in
>>                                                                             the
>>                                                                             pom,
>>                                                                             which
>>                                                                             suggests
>>                                                                             that
>>                                                                             it
>>                                                                             could
>>                                                                             be
>>                                                                             done
>>                                                                             to
>>                                                                             accept
>>                                                                             a switch
>>                                                                             to
>>                                                                             mvn
>>                                                                             build.
>>
>>                                                                             James
>>
>>                                                                             On
>>                                                                             11/09/15
>>                                                                             14:50,
>>                                                                             Andrew
>>                                                                             Purtell
>>                                                                             wrote:
>>
>>                                                                                 The
>>                                                                                 first
>>                                                                                 step
>>                                                                                 I think
>>                                                                                 is
>>                                                                                 a repo
>>                                                                                 with
>>                                                                                 code
>>                                                                                 that
>>                                                                                 compiles.
>>                                                                                 Please
>>                                                                                 initialize
>>                                                                                 it
>>                                                                                 by
>>                                                                                 forking
>>                                                                                 github.com/apache/phoenix
>>                                                                                 <http://github.com/apache/phoenix>
>>                                                                                 so
>>                                                                                 we
>>                                                                                 have
>>                                                                                 common
>>                                                                                 ancestors.
>>                                                                                 Once
>>                                                                                 we
>>                                                                                 have
>>                                                                                 a clear
>>                                                                                 idea
>>                                                                                 (by
>>                                                                                 diff)
>>                                                                                 what
>>                                                                                 is
>>                                                                                 required
>>                                                                                 we
>>                                                                                 can
>>                                                                                 figure
>>                                                                                 out
>>                                                                                 if
>>                                                                                 we
>>                                                                                 can
>>                                                                                 support
>>                                                                                 compatibility
>>                                                                                 in
>>                                                                                 some
>>                                                                                 way.
>>
>>
>>                                                                                 On
>>                                                                                 Sep
>>                                                                                 9,
>>                                                                                 2015,
>>                                                                                 at
>>                                                                                 11:00
>>                                                                                 PM,
>>                                                                                 Krishna
>>                                                                                 <research800@gmail.com
>>                                                                                 <mailto:research800@gmail.com>>
>>                                                                                 wrote:
>>
>>                                                                                     I can
>>                                                                                     volunteer
>>                                                                                     to
>>                                                                                     spend
>>                                                                                     some
>>                                                                                     time
>>                                                                                     on
>>                                                                                     this.
>>
>>
>>                                                                                     CDH
>>                                                                                     artifacts
>>                                                                                     are
>>                                                                                     available
>>                                                                                     in
>>                                                                                     Maven
>>                                                                                     repo
>>                                                                                     but
>>                                                                                     from reading
>>                                                                                     other
>>                                                                                     threads
>>                                                                                     on
>>                                                                                     CDH-Phoenix
>>                                                                                     compatibilty,
>>                                                                                     it
>>                                                                                     looks
>>                                                                                     like
>>                                                                                     there
>>                                                                                     are
>>                                                                                     some
>>                                                                                     code
>>                                                                                     changes
>>                                                                                     to
>>                                                                                     be
>>                                                                                     made
>>                                                                                     in
>>                                                                                     Phoenix
>>                                                                                     to
>>                                                                                     successfully compile
>>                                                                                     against
>>                                                                                     CDH.
>>
>>
>>                                                                                     Here
>>                                                                                     are
>>                                                                                     questions
>>                                                                                     to
>>                                                                                     address:
>>
>>                                                                                     1)
>>                                                                                     How
>>                                                                                     to
>>                                                                                     maintain
>>                                                                                     CDH
>>                                                                                     compatible
>>                                                                                     Phoenix
>>                                                                                     code
>>                                                                                     base?
>>
>>
>>                                                                                     2)
>>                                                                                     Is
>>                                                                                     having
>>                                                                                     a CDH
>>                                                                                     compatible
>>                                                                                     branch
>>                                                                                     even
>>                                                                                     an
>>                                                                                     option?
>>
>>
>>                                                                                     Krishna
>>
>>
>>
>>                                                                                     On
>>                                                                                     Friday,
>>                                                                                     August
>>                                                                                     28,
>>                                                                                     2015,
>>                                                                                     Andrew
>>                                                                                     Purtell
>>                                                                                     <andrew.purtell@gmail.com
>>                                                                                     <mailto:andrew.purtell@gmail.com>>
>>                                                                                     wrote:
>>
>>                                                                                         Yes
>>                                                                                         I am
>>                                                                                         interested.
>>                                                                                         Assuming
>>                                                                                         CDH
>>                                                                                         artifacts
>>                                                                                         are
>>                                                                                         publicly
>>                                                                                         available
>>                                                                                         in
>>                                                                                         a Maven
>>                                                                                         repo
>>                                                                                         somewhere,
>>                                                                                         which
>>                                                                                         I believe
>>                                                                                         is
>>                                                                                         the
>>                                                                                         case,
>>                                                                                         perhaps
>>                                                                                         we
>>                                                                                         (the
>>                                                                                         Phoenix
>>                                                                                         project/community)
>>                                                                                         could
>>                                                                                         set
>>                                                                                         up
>>                                                                                         a Jenkins
>>                                                                                         job
>>                                                                                         that
>>                                                                                         builds
>>                                                                                         against
>>                                                                                         them
>>                                                                                         and
>>                                                                                         makes
>>                                                                                         the
>>                                                                                         resulting
>>                                                                                         build
>>                                                                                         artifacts
>>                                                                                         available.
>>                                                                                         They
>>                                                                                         would
>>                                                                                         never
>>                                                                                         be
>>                                                                                         an
>>                                                                                         official
>>                                                                                         release,
>>                                                                                         just
>>                                                                                         a best
>>                                                                                         effort
>>                                                                                         convenience.
>>                                                                                         Would
>>                                                                                         that
>>                                                                                         work?
>>                                                                                         I think
>>                                                                                         little
>>                                                                                         must
>>                                                                                         be
>>                                                                                         done
>>                                                                                         besides
>>                                                                                         compile
>>                                                                                         against
>>                                                                                         the
>>                                                                                         CDH
>>                                                                                         artifacts
>>                                                                                         for
>>                                                                                         binary
>>                                                                                         compatibility.
>>
>>
>>                                                                                         > On
>>                                                                                         Aug
>>                                                                                         28,
>>                                                                                         2015,
>>                                                                                         at
>>                                                                                         11:19
>>                                                                                         AM,
>>                                                                                         James
>>                                                                                         Heather
>>                                                                                         <james.heather@mendeley.com
>>                                                                                         <mailto:james.heather@mendeley.com>>
>>                                                                                         wrote:
>>                                                                                         >
>>                                                                                         > Is
>>                                                                                         anyone
>>                                                                                         interested
>>                                                                                         in
>>                                                                                         helping
>>                                                                                         with
>>                                                                                         getting
>>                                                                                         an
>>                                                                                         up-to-date
>>                                                                                         CDH5-compatible
>>                                                                                         build
>>                                                                                         of
>>                                                                                         Phoenix
>>                                                                                         up
>>                                                                                         and
>>                                                                                         running?
>>                                                                                         >
>>                                                                                         > Cloudera
>>                                                                                         has
>>                                                                                         a build
>>                                                                                         of
>>                                                                                         Phoenix
>>                                                                                         4.3
>>                                                                                         (https://github.com/cloudera-labs/phoenix),
>>                                                                                         but
>>                                                                                         this
>>                                                                                         is
>>                                                                                         now
>>                                                                                         two
>>                                                                                         versions
>>                                                                                         behind,
>>                                                                                         and
>>                                                                                         there
>>                                                                                         seems
>>                                                                                         little
>>                                                                                         desire
>>                                                                                         at
>>                                                                                         Cloudera
>>                                                                                         to
>>                                                                                         keep
>>                                                                                         it
>>                                                                                         updated.
>>                                                                                         >
>>                                                                                         > I
>>                                                                                         imagine
>>                                                                                         that
>>                                                                                         by
>>                                                                                         looking
>>                                                                                         at
>>                                                                                         the
>>                                                                                         differences
>>                                                                                         between
>>                                                                                         vanilla
>>                                                                                         4.3
>>                                                                                         and
>>                                                                                         cloudera
>>                                                                                         labs
>>                                                                                         4.3,
>>                                                                                         and
>>                                                                                         with
>>                                                                                         some
>>                                                                                         guidance
>>                                                                                         from
>>                                                                                         this
>>                                                                                         list,
>>                                                                                         we
>>                                                                                         could
>>                                                                                         get
>>                                                                                         a good
>>                                                                                         idea
>>                                                                                         of
>>                                                                                         what
>>                                                                                         would
>>                                                                                         need
>>                                                                                         to
>>                                                                                         be
>>                                                                                         modified
>>                                                                                         in
>>                                                                                         4.5+
>>                                                                                         and
>>                                                                                         keep
>>                                                                                         a CDH5-compatible
>>                                                                                         build
>>                                                                                         up
>>                                                                                         to
>>                                                                                         date.
>>                                                                                         >
>>                                                                                         > Yes?
>>                                                                                         >
>>                                                                                         > James
>>
>>
>>
>>                                     -- 
>>
>>                                     Best regards,
>>
>>                                        - Andy
>>
>>                                     Problems worthy of attack prove
>>                                     their worth by hitting back. -
>>                                     Piet Hein (via Tom White)
>>
>>
>>
>>                             -- 
>>
>>                             Best regards,
>>
>>                                - Andy
>>
>>                             Problems worthy of attack prove their
>>                             worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via
>>                             Tom White)
>>
>>
>
>


Mime
View raw message