phoenix-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>
Subject Re: anyone relying on hadoop1 still?
Date Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:29:57 GMT
Just a curiosity..what is the difference between hbase on hadoop1 or
hadoop2 from a functional point of view?
Does HBase on hadoop2 (Hoya?) rely on YARN features?

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:15 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org>
wrote:

> We'll definitely remove hadoop1 support from 4.x, as it's causing pom
> issues. We can't support both hadoop1 and hadoop2 and make hadoop2 the
> default (see prior discussions - basically due to how other projects
> poms are authored).
>
> Sounds like a few folks are still relying on hadoop1 for 3.x, so I
> guess we can leave support there a while longer.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:54 AM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org> wrote:
> > At the very least we could make hadoop2 the default target in 4.x.
> > Seems fair to remove all the cruft from the 4 branch, too.
> >
> > There's still a fair amount of usage of HBase 0.94 on top of Hadoop 1.
> > So maybe keep it alive in 3.0? 3.0 can be retired when HBase 0.94 is
> retired (although I have no plans for 0.94 retirement, yet).
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org>
> > To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <dev@phoenix.apache.org>; user <
> user@phoenix.apache.org>
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:19 PM
> > Subject: anyone relying on hadoop1 still?
> >
> > Hello,
> > We've been planning on dropping hadoop1 support for our 4.x releases
> > for a while now and it looks like it'll happen in 4.2. It'd be nice if
> > we could do the same for our 3.x releases, as the more similar the two
> > branches are, the less time it takes to keep them in sync.
> >
> > Is anyone out there still relying on hadoop1 support for future 3.x
> releases?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
>

Mime
View raw message