phoenix-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>
Subject Re: anyone relying on hadoop1 still?
Date Fri, 26 Sep 2014 05:58:40 GMT
So Hoya is a different thing from Hbase on hadoop 2?
On Sep 25, 2014 11:23 PM, "Jesse Yates" <jesse.k.yates@gmail.com> wrote:

> Mostly its the use of hadoop metrics2 that has to change, as they change
> the backing methods. If you are interested, take the hbase compatibility
> layer <https://github.com/apache/hbase/tree/master/hbase-hadoop-compat/>
> to see most of where HBase shims things.
>
> -------------------
> Jesse Yates
> @jesse_yates
> jyates.github.com
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <pompermaier@okkam.it>
> wrote:
>
>> Any help here? :(
>> On Sep 24, 2014 8:29 AM, "Flavio Pompermaier" <pompermaier@okkam.it>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Just a curiosity..what is the difference between hbase on hadoop1 or
>>> hadoop2 from a functional point of view?
>>> Does HBase on hadoop2 (Hoya?) rely on YARN features?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:15 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We'll definitely remove hadoop1 support from 4.x, as it's causing pom
>>>> issues. We can't support both hadoop1 and hadoop2 and make hadoop2 the
>>>> default (see prior discussions - basically due to how other projects
>>>> poms are authored).
>>>>
>>>> Sounds like a few folks are still relying on hadoop1 for 3.x, so I
>>>> guess we can leave support there a while longer.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> James
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:54 AM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > At the very least we could make hadoop2 the default target in 4.x.
>>>> > Seems fair to remove all the cruft from the 4 branch, too.
>>>> >
>>>> > There's still a fair amount of usage of HBase 0.94 on top of Hadoop
1.
>>>> > So maybe keep it alive in 3.0? 3.0 can be retired when HBase 0.94 is
>>>> retired (although I have no plans for 0.94 retirement, yet).
>>>> >
>>>> > -- Lars
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>>> > From: James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org>
>>>> > To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <dev@phoenix.apache.org>; user <
>>>> user@phoenix.apache.org>
>>>> > Cc:
>>>> > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:19 PM
>>>> > Subject: anyone relying on hadoop1 still?
>>>> >
>>>> > Hello,
>>>> > We've been planning on dropping hadoop1 support for our 4.x releases
>>>> > for a while now and it looks like it'll happen in 4.2. It'd be nice
if
>>>> > we could do the same for our 3.x releases, as the more similar the two
>>>> > branches are, the less time it takes to keep them in sync.
>>>> >
>>>> > Is anyone out there still relying on hadoop1 support for future 3.x
>>>> releases?
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > James
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Mime
View raw message