phoenix-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>
Subject Re: anyone relying on hadoop1 still?
Date Thu, 25 Sep 2014 21:17:36 GMT
Any help here? :(
On Sep 24, 2014 8:29 AM, "Flavio Pompermaier" <pompermaier@okkam.it> wrote:

> Just a curiosity..what is the difference between hbase on hadoop1 or
> hadoop2 from a functional point of view?
> Does HBase on hadoop2 (Hoya?) rely on YARN features?
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:15 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> We'll definitely remove hadoop1 support from 4.x, as it's causing pom
>> issues. We can't support both hadoop1 and hadoop2 and make hadoop2 the
>> default (see prior discussions - basically due to how other projects
>> poms are authored).
>>
>> Sounds like a few folks are still relying on hadoop1 for 3.x, so I
>> guess we can leave support there a while longer.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> James
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:54 AM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org> wrote:
>> > At the very least we could make hadoop2 the default target in 4.x.
>> > Seems fair to remove all the cruft from the 4 branch, too.
>> >
>> > There's still a fair amount of usage of HBase 0.94 on top of Hadoop 1.
>> > So maybe keep it alive in 3.0? 3.0 can be retired when HBase 0.94 is
>> retired (although I have no plans for 0.94 retirement, yet).
>> >
>> > -- Lars
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org>
>> > To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <dev@phoenix.apache.org>; user <
>> user@phoenix.apache.org>
>> > Cc:
>> > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:19 PM
>> > Subject: anyone relying on hadoop1 still?
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> > We've been planning on dropping hadoop1 support for our 4.x releases
>> > for a while now and it looks like it'll happen in 4.2. It'd be nice if
>> > we could do the same for our 3.x releases, as the more similar the two
>> > branches are, the less time it takes to keep them in sync.
>> >
>> > Is anyone out there still relying on hadoop1 support for future 3.x
>> releases?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > James
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message