phoenix-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: anyone relying on hadoop1 still?
Date Fri, 26 Sep 2014 20:50:20 GMT
Hoya isn't HBase or Phoenix. It's a separate project, now named
Slider, now in incubation at Apache, see
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/slider.html

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Flavio Pompermaier
<pompermaier@okkam.it> wrote:
> So Hoya is a different thing from Hbase on hadoop 2?
>
> On Sep 25, 2014 11:23 PM, "Jesse Yates" <jesse.k.yates@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Mostly its the use of hadoop metrics2 that has to change, as they change
>> the backing methods. If you are interested, take the hbase compatibility
>> layer to see most of where HBase shims things.
>>
>> -------------------
>> Jesse Yates
>> @jesse_yates
>> jyates.github.com
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <pompermaier@okkam.it>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Any help here? :(
>>>
>>> On Sep 24, 2014 8:29 AM, "Flavio Pompermaier" <pompermaier@okkam.it>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just a curiosity..what is the difference between hbase on hadoop1 or
>>>> hadoop2 from a functional point of view?
>>>> Does HBase on hadoop2 (Hoya?) rely on YARN features?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:15 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We'll definitely remove hadoop1 support from 4.x, as it's causing pom
>>>>> issues. We can't support both hadoop1 and hadoop2 and make hadoop2 the
>>>>> default (see prior discussions - basically due to how other projects
>>>>> poms are authored).
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds like a few folks are still relying on hadoop1 for 3.x, so I
>>>>> guess we can leave support there a while longer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> James
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:54 AM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > At the very least we could make hadoop2 the default target in 4.x.
>>>>> > Seems fair to remove all the cruft from the 4 branch, too.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > There's still a fair amount of usage of HBase 0.94 on top of Hadoop
>>>>> > 1.
>>>>> > So maybe keep it alive in 3.0? 3.0 can be retired when HBase 0.94
is
>>>>> > retired (although I have no plans for 0.94 retirement, yet).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -- Lars
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> > From: James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org>
>>>>> > To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <dev@phoenix.apache.org>; user
>>>>> > <user@phoenix.apache.org>
>>>>> > Cc:
>>>>> > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:19 PM
>>>>> > Subject: anyone relying on hadoop1 still?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Hello,
>>>>> > We've been planning on dropping hadoop1 support for our 4.x releases
>>>>> > for a while now and it looks like it'll happen in 4.2. It'd be nice
>>>>> > if
>>>>> > we could do the same for our 3.x releases, as the more similar the
>>>>> > two
>>>>> > branches are, the less time it takes to keep them in sync.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Is anyone out there still relying on hadoop1 support for future
3.x
>>>>> > releases?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>> > James
>>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein (via Tom White)

Mime
View raw message