It will be great if you can share the performance matrix that you have (even 1 year old. something is better than nothing.)Thanks!--HarshitOn Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <email@example.com> wrote:We haven't done thorough performance comparison recently apart from what is listed on Phoenix performance page. For Shark, let me see if I can find basic number that we tried about a year back. On top of my head what I can recall is that Shark was faster only for small in-memory tables when compared to Phoenix, for standard tables, Phoenix was much much faster.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Localhost shell <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Thanks for the quick response.Is there any Hive Vs Impala Vs Shark or other tools performance comparison?I am trying to convince folks in my project to use Hbase-Phoenix combination. I understand the optimizations done by phoenix by using coprocessors and custom filters.Hence these performance graphs will help me build a more convincing argument.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Mujtaba Chohan <email@example.com> wrote:
Hi Harshit,Take a look at this. This compares Phoenix 2.2.3 against latest 3.0.0-RC and 4.0.0-RC using various schema tables. http://phoenix-bin.github.io/client/performance/phoenix-20140324122633.htm//MujtabaOn Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Localhost shell <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Hey All,I couldn't find the performance comparison graphs on the apache site.I found few at info at https://github.com/forcedotcom/phoenix/wiki/Performance but it's quite old and also the data and nature of query is also very basic.Query: select count(1) from table over 1M and 5M rows. Data is 3 narrow columns. Number of Region Server: 1 (Virtual Machine, HBase heap: 2GB, Processor: 2 cores @ 3.3GHz Xeon)
Can anyone point me to some more concrete performance number if available?--Harshit